Functional Brands Inc. (MEHA) vs Smart for Life, Inc. (SMFL)

Functional Brands Inc. and Smart for Life, Inc. are both Packaged Foods companies. Functional Brands Inc. is the larger, with a market value of $1.9M against $40.0K — 48.0× the size. Functional Brands Inc. has the higher net margin (−126.9% vs −320.7%) and the higher return on invested capital (0.00% vs −181.3%). Across the 12 metrics below, Functional Brands Inc. leads on 9 and Smart for Life, Inc. on 3.

Valuation

Metric MEHA SMFL Packaged Foods median
P/E n/m n/m 12.69
P/S n/m n/m 0.61
P/B n/m n/m 1.47
Price to free cash flow n/m n/m 8.50
EV/EBITDA n/m n/m 8.20
EV/Sales 0.19 0.57 0.85
Earnings yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Free cash flow yield 0.00% 0.00% 6.05%

Profitability

Metric MEHA SMFL Packaged Foods median
Gross margin 55.64% 47.74% 27.54%
Operating margin (47.94%) (212.09%) 0.00%
Net margin (126.93%) (320.72%) 0.00%
Free cash flow margin (42.70%) (6.69%) 2.56%
Return on equity 553.71% (1,922.49%) 0.00%
Return on assets (263.75%) (94.97%) 0.00%
Return on invested capital 0.00% (181.31%) 0.00%

Growth

Metric MEHA SMFL Packaged Foods median
Revenue growth (TTM) — (18.97%) 5.69%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) 112.50% 94.67% —
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR — — 3.81%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR — — 0.00%

Health

Metric MEHA SMFL Packaged Foods median
Debt to equity (0.54) 3.45 0.26
Current ratio 0.49 0.17 1.64
Net debt to EBITDA 1.88 (0.89) 0.87

Dividend

Metric MEHA SMFL Packaged Foods median
Dividend yield — — 3.21%
Payout ratio — 0.00 0.00

Size

Metric MEHA SMFL Packaged Foods median
Market cap 1.92m 40.00k 245.45m

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack