Functional Brands Inc. (MEHA) vs Real Good Food Company, Inc. (RGFC)

Functional Brands Inc. and Real Good Food Company, Inc. are both Packaged Foods companies. Real Good Food Company, Inc. is the larger, with a market value of $2.2M against $1.9M — 1.1× the size. Real Good Food Company, Inc. has the higher net margin (−9.71% vs −126.9%) and the lower return on invested capital (−31.5% vs 0.00%). Across the 14 metrics below, Functional Brands Inc. leads on 7 and Real Good Food Company, Inc. on 7.

Valuation

Metric MEHA RGFC Packaged Foods median
P/E n/m n/m 12.69
P/S n/m 0.00 0.61
P/B n/m n/m 1.47
Price to free cash flow n/m n/m 8.50
EV/EBITDA n/m n/m 8.20
EV/Sales 0.19 0.78 0.85
Earnings yield 0.00% (8,283.30%) 0.00%
Free cash flow yield 0.00% (17,285.30%) 6.05%

Profitability

Metric MEHA RGFC Packaged Foods median
Gross margin 55.64% 16.80% 27.54%
Operating margin (47.94%) (25.26%) 0.00%
Net margin (126.93%) (9.71%) 0.00%
Free cash flow margin (42.70%) (24.53%) 2.56%
Return on equity 553.71% 73.50% 0.00%
Return on assets (263.75%) (11.03%) 0.00%
Return on invested capital 0.00% (31.50%) 0.00%

Growth

Metric MEHA RGFC Packaged Foods median
Revenue growth (TTM) — 18.88% 5.69%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) 112.50% 83.72% —
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR — — 3.81%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR — — 0.00%

Health

Metric MEHA RGFC Packaged Foods median
Debt to equity (0.54) (2.79) 0.26
Current ratio 0.49 1.56 1.64
Net debt to EBITDA 1.88 (2.54) 0.87

Dividend

Metric MEHA RGFC Packaged Foods median
Dividend yield — — 3.21%
Payout ratio — 0.00 0.00

Size

Metric MEHA RGFC Packaged Foods median
Market cap 1.92m 2.18m 245.45m

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack