Functional Brands Inc. (MEHA) vs Real Good Food Company, Inc. (RGFC)
- Functional Brands Inc. MEHA 0.00 NaN
- Real Good Food Company, Inc. RGFC 0.60 +9.09%
Functional Brands Inc. and Real Good Food Company, Inc. are both Packaged Foods companies. Real Good Food Company, Inc. is the larger, with a market value of $2.2M against $1.9M — 1.1× the size. Real Good Food Company, Inc. has the higher net margin (−9.71% vs −126.9%) and the lower return on invested capital (−31.5% vs 0.00%). Across the 14 metrics below, Functional Brands Inc. leads on 7 and Real Good Food Company, Inc. on 7.
Valuation
Profitability
| Metric | MEHA | RGFC | Packaged Foods median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.64% | 16.80% | 27.54% |
| Operating margin | (47.94%) | (25.26%) | 0.00% |
| Net margin | (126.93%) | (9.71%) | 0.00% |
| Free cash flow margin | (42.70%) | (24.53%) | 2.37% |
| Return on equity | 553.71% | 73.50% | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | (263.75%) | (11.03%) | 0.00% |
| Return on invested capital | 0.00% | (31.50%) | 0.00% |
Growth
Health
Dividend
Size
Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack