Pricing Log in Create free account

Agape ATP Corporation (ATPC) vs Functional Brands Inc. (MEHA)

Agape ATP Corporation and Functional Brands Inc. are both Packaged Foods companies. Functional Brands Inc. is the larger, with a market value of $1.9M against $1.3M — 1.5× the size. Agape ATP Corporation has the higher net margin (−86.5% vs −126.9%) and the lower return on invested capital (−8.91% vs 0.00%). Across the 14 metrics below, Functional Brands Inc. leads on 9 and Agape ATP Corporation on 5.

Valuation

Metric ATPC MEHA Packaged Foods median
P/E n/m n/m 12.84
P/S 1.02 n/m 0.67
P/B 0.06 n/m 1.58
Price to free cash flow n/m n/m 8.97
EV/EBITDA n/m n/m 8.34
EV/Sales 1.01 0.19 0.97
Earnings yield (85.03%) 0.00% 2.16%
Free cash flow yield (72.49%) 0.00% 5.54%

Profitability

Metric ATPC MEHA Packaged Foods median
Gross margin 59.88% 55.64% 28.37%
Operating margin (238.91%) (47.94%) 2.53%
Net margin (86.53%) (126.93%) 0.53%
Free cash flow margin (73.75%) (42.70%) 2.31%
Return on equity (5.01%) 553.71% 0.00%
Return on assets (4.58%) (263.75%) 0.00%
Return on invested capital (8.91%) 0.00% 0.00%

Growth

Metric ATPC MEHA Packaged Foods median
Revenue growth (TTM) 10.82% — 3.59%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) 90.95% 112.50% 4.57%
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR (15.08%) — 3.81%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR 0.00% — 0.00%

Health

Metric ATPC MEHA Packaged Foods median
Debt to equity 0.00 (0.54) 0.18
Current ratio 8.45 0.49 1.84
Net debt to EBITDA 0.01 1.88 0.73

Dividend

Metric ATPC MEHA Packaged Foods median
Dividend yield — — 3.68%
Payout ratio — — 0.62

Size

Metric ATPC MEHA Packaged Foods median
Market cap 1.29m 1.92m 268.23m

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack