Pricing Log in Create free account

B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) vs FitLife Brands Inc. (FTLF)

B&G Foods, Inc. and FitLife Brands Inc. are both Packaged Foods companies. B&G Foods, Inc. is the larger, with a market value of $196.7M against $80.5M — 2.4× the size. B&G Foods, Inc. has negative trailing earnings, so its P/E is not meaningful; FitLife Brands Inc. trades at 12.7×. FitLife Brands Inc. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months: 60.6% against −4.91%. FitLife Brands Inc. has the higher net margin (6.15% vs −4.00%) and the higher return on invested capital (8.17% vs 1.69%). Across the 21 metrics below, FitLife Brands Inc. leads on 14 and B&G Foods, Inc. on 7.

Valuation

Metric BGS FTLF Packaged Foods median
P/E n/m 12.71 13.41
P/S 0.11 0.78 0.62
P/B 0.47 1.66 1.47
Price to free cash flow 1.62 7.88 8.73
EV/EBITDA 9.98 8.91 8.26
EV/Sales 1.20 1.14 0.91
Earnings yield (38.86%) 7.87% 0.68%
Free cash flow yield 61.59% 12.68% 5.21%

Profitability

Metric BGS FTLF Packaged Foods median
Gross margin 21.53% 36.54% 27.54%
Operating margin 3.55% 10.86% 0.00%
Net margin (4.00%) 6.15% 0.00%
Free cash flow margin 6.46% 9.91% 2.37%
Return on equity (15.80%) 14.11% 0.00%
Return on assets (2.25%) 7.53% 0.00%
Return on invested capital 1.69% 8.17% 0.00%

Growth

Metric BGS FTLF Packaged Foods median
Revenue growth (TTM) (4.91%) 60.61% 5.69%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) 83.02% (30.77%) 4.57%
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR (1.46%) 29.80% 3.81%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR 0.00% (6.44%) 0.00%

Health

Metric BGS FTLF Packaged Foods median
Debt to equity 6.38 0.80 0.24
Current ratio 1.62 1.46 1.68
Net debt to EBITDA 7.55 3.71 0.84

Dividend

Metric BGS FTLF Packaged Foods median
Dividend yield 24.89% — 4.06%
Payout ratio — — 0.57

Size

Metric BGS FTLF Packaged Foods median
Market cap 196.69m 80.53m 263.30m

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack