White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd.
WTM Financial Insurance Property & Casualty
White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $3.7 billion, up 66.8% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 22.6%, EPS grew 68.8%, free cash flow fell 131.3% and total debt rose 34.2%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for ten consecutive years, revenue growth for three.
Follow WTM
White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (WTM) Piotroski F-score
White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 6 out of 9: 6 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, up from 5 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 6 | 1.00 |
| FY2024 | 5 | (1.00) |
| FY2023 | 6 | (1.00) |
| FY2022 | 7 | 3.00 |
| FY2021 | 4 | (1.00) |
| FY2020 | 5 | (1.00) |
| FY2019 | 6 | 3.00 |
| FY2018 | 3 | (4.00) |
| FY2017 | 7 | 2.00 |
| FY2016 | 5 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 9.95% | 2.52% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 550.50m | 586.80m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 9.95% | 2.52% | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | (555.90m) | 356.40m | Fail | 0 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.08 | 0.06 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 0.45 | 0.44 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 2,534,300 | 2,532,200 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 60.47% | 43.76% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.34 | 0.24 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 6 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| THG The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. compare | 7 |
| PLMR Palomar Holdings, Inc. compare | 7 |
| WTM White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. | 6 |
| MCY Mercury General Corporation compare | 6 |
| SIGI Selective Insurance Group, Inc. compare | 6 |
| KNSL Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. compare | 6 |
| RLI RLI Corp. compare | 6 |
| HGTY Hagerty, Inc. compare | 6 |
| LMND Lemonade, Inc. compare | 5 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover