Velo3D, Inc.
VELO Technology Computer Hardware
Velo3D, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $46.0 million, up 12.1% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 52.3%, EPS grew 60.2%, free cash flow fell 731.6% and total debt fell 63.6%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Operating cash flow growth for three consecutive years.
Follow VELO
Velo3D, Inc. (VELO) Piotroski F-score
Velo3D, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 3 out of 9: 3 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 4 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 3 | (1.00) |
| FY2024 | 4 | 2.00 |
| FY2023 | 2 | (1.00) |
| FY2022 | 3 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (73.37%) | (57.41%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (27.33m) | (32.68m) | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | (73.37%) | (57.41%) | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 44.04m | 37.07m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.25 | 0.00 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 2.37 | 1.52 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 16,487,000 | 847,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | (16.11%) | (5.08%) | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.47 | 0.34 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated | 3 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| OSS One Stop Systems, Inc. compare | 6 |
| SSYS Stratasys, Ltd. compare | 5 |
| DDD 3D Systems Corporation compare | 5 |
| NNDM Nano Dimension Ltd. compare | 4 |
| CAN Canaan Inc. Sponsored ADR compare | 4 |
| VELO Velo3D, Inc. | 3 |
| DPRO Draganfly Inc. compare | 3 |
| BGIN Bgin Blockchain Limited compare | 2 |
| QTEX QTREX Quantum Ltd. compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover