Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
STRL Industrials Engineering & Construction
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $2.5 billion, up 17.7% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 90.1%, EPS grew 118.0%, free cash flow grew 55.3% and total debt fell 10.3%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Revenue growth for ten consecutive years.
Follow STRL
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) Piotroski F-score
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 6 out of 9: 6 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 7 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 6 | (1.00) |
| FY2024 | 7 | 1.00 |
| FY2023 | 6 | (2.00) |
| FY2022 | 8 | 3.00 |
| FY2021 | 5 | 0.00 |
| FY2020 | 5 | 0.00 |
| FY2019 | 5 | (2.00) |
| FY2018 | 7 | 0.00 |
| FY2017 | 7 | 1.00 |
| FY2016 | 6 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 12.48% | 13.57% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 439.99m | 497.10m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 12.48% | 13.57% | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 149.84m | 239.64m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.12 | 0.15 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.01 | 1.38 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 30,542,000 | 30,830,000 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising gross margin | 22.98% | 20.14% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 1.07 | 1.12 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 6 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| J Jacobs Solutions Inc. compare | 7 |
| MTZ MasTec, Inc. compare | 7 |
| IESC IES Holdings, Inc. compare | 7 |
| ACA Arcosa, Inc. compare | 7 |
| ACM AECOM compare | 7 |
| STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 6 |
| APG APi Group Corporation compare | 6 |
| TTEK Tetra Tech, Inc. compare | 6 |
| DY Dycom Industries, Inc. compare | 5 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover