Spectrum Brands Holdings Inc.
SPB Consumer Defensive Household & Personal Products
Spectrum Brands Holdings Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended September 2025) was $2.8 billion, down 5.23% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 7.68%, EPS fell 245.0%, free cash flow grew 2.37% and total debt fell 7.62%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for ten consecutive years, operating cash flow growth for three; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow SPB
Spectrum Brands Holdings Inc. (SPB) Beneish M-score
Spectrum Brands Holdings Inc.'s Beneish M-score for fiscal 2025 is −2.74; values above −1.78 are the model's flag for possible earnings manipulation — a statistical screen, not a finding.
Beneish M-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Beneish M-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −2.74 | (0.54) |
| FY2024 | −2.20 | (0.67) |
| FY2023 | −1.54 | 0.86 |
| FY2022 | −2.40 | 0.54 |
| FY2021 | −2.94 | 0.01 |
| FY2020 | −2.95 | (0.80) |
| FY2019 | −2.15 | (0.82) |
| FY2018 | −1.33 | 2.39 |
| FY2017 | −3.73 | (0.16) |
| FY2016 | −3.56 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Component | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days’ sales in receivables index | 0.86 | — | 0.79 | |
| Gross margin index | 1.02 | — | 0.54 | |
| Asset quality index | 1.10 | — | 0.45 | |
| Sales growth index | 0.95 | — | 0.85 | |
| Depreciation index | 1.00 | — | 0.11 | |
| SG&A index | 0.98 | — | −0.17 | |
| Total accruals to total assets | (0.03) | — | −0.14 | |
| Leverage index | 0.99 | — | −0.32 | |
| Beneish M-score | Low — no pattern the model associates with manipulation | −2.74 | ||
How the Beneish M-score works
M = −4.84 + 0.920 × DSRI + 0.528 × GMI + 0.404 × AQI + 0.892 × SGI + 0.115 × DEPI − 0.172 × SGAI + 4.679 × TATA − 0.327 × LVGI (Beneish, 1999): eight changes in the accounts from one fiscal year to the next, which the model weighs for the pattern seen in companies that later restated their earnings. Higher is worse.
| below −2.22 | Low — no pattern the model associates with manipulation |
|---|---|
| −2.22 to −1.78 | Elevated |
| above −1.78 | Flagged by the model |
−1.78 is the cut-off usually quoted from the paper, −2.22 a common conservative one. A statistical screen, not a finding of wrongdoing.
When asset quality, depreciation or SG&A cannot be worked out, that index is set to 1, as Beneish did, and the breakdown says so; with all three missing there is no score. Depreciation includes amortisation, and asset quality leaves out securities. Not worked out for banks, insurers and REITs.
Beneish M-score against peers
| Company | Beneish M-score |
|---|---|
| HELE Helen of Troy Limited compare | −5.2× |
| HNST The Honest Company, Inc. compare | −3.3× |
| COTY Coty compare | −3.0× |
| SPB Spectrum Brands Holdings Inc. | −2.7× |
| NWL Newell Brands Inc. compare | −2.6× |
| ELF e.l.f. Beauty compare | −2.6× |
| EPC Edgewell Personal Care Company compare | −2.4× |
| IPAR Interparfums, Inc. compare | −2.3× |
| ODD ODDITY Tech Ltd. compare | −2.1× |
What Beneish M-score is
The Beneish M-Score combines eight year-on-year changes in the accounts into a statistical screen for patterns seen in companies that overstated earnings.
−4.84 + 0.920 × DSRI + 0.528 × GMI + 0.404 × AQI + 0.892 × SGI + 0.115 × DEPI − 0.172 × SGAI + 4.679 × TATA − 0.327 × LVGI