Li Auto Inc. Sponsored ADR
LI Consumer Cyclical Auto Manufacturers
Li Auto Inc. Sponsored ADR’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $16.1 billion, down 18.8% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue fell 10.4%, EPS fell 266.7%, free cash flow grew 291.2% and total debt fell 10.3%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for three consecutive years.
Follow LI
Li Auto Inc. Sponsored ADR (LI) Piotroski F-score
Li Auto Inc. Sponsored ADR's Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 2 out of 9: 2 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 4 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 2 | (2.00) |
| FY2024 | 4 | (3.00) |
| FY2023 | 7 | 3.00 |
| FY2022 | 4 | (1.00) |
| FY2021 | 5 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 0.73% | 5.18% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | (1.23b) | 2.18b | Fail | 0 |
| Rising return on assets | 0.73% | 5.18% | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | (1.39b) | 1.08b | Fail | 0 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.02 | 0.06 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.81 | 1.82 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 1,007,535,000 | 996,596,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 18.68% | 20.53% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.72 | 0.93 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated | 2 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| RACE Ferrari N.V. compare | 8 |
| NIO NIO Inc. compare | 6 |
| XPEV XPeng Inc. Sponsored ADR compare | 5 |
| RIVN Rivian Automotive, Inc. compare | 4 |
| VFS VinFast Auto Ltd. compare | 4 |
| STLA Stellantis N.V. compare | 3 |
| F Ford Motor Company compare | 3 |
| HMC Honda Motor Co., Ltd. compare | 3 |
| LI Li Auto Inc. Sponsored ADR | 2 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover