Globant S.A.
GLOB Technology Information Technology Services
Globant S.A.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $2.5 billion, up 1.62% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue was flat, EPS grew 180.0%, free cash flow grew 476.2% and total debt fell 1.71%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Revenue growth for ten consecutive years; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow GLOB
Globant S.A. (GLOB) Piotroski F-score
Globant S.A.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 3 out of 9: 3 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 4 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 3 | (1.00) |
| FY2024 | 4 | 1.00 |
| FY2023 | 3 | (3.00) |
| FY2022 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2021 | 6 | 1.00 |
| FY2020 | 5 | 2.00 |
| FY2019 | 3 | (5.00) |
| FY2018 | 8 | 3.00 |
| FY2017 | 5 | 2.00 |
| FY2016 | 3 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 3.18% | 5.64% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 301.18m | 248.73m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 3.18% | 5.64% | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 198.26m | 83.00m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.11 | 0.10 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.64 | 1.65 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 44,228,000 | 43,402,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 35.00% | 35.74% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.76 | 0.82 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated | 3 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| INOD Innodata Inc compare | 6 |
| DXC DXC Technology Company. compare | 6 |
| FORTY Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. compare | 6 |
| PONY Pony AI Inc. - Sponsored ADR compare | 4 |
| MGRT Mega Fortune Company Limited compare | 4 |
| CNXC Concentrix Corporation compare | 4 |
| EFOR Everforth Inc. compare | 4 |
| GLOB Globant S.A. | 3 |
| KEEL Keel Infrastructure Corp compare | 2 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover