Figma, Inc.
FIG Technology Software Application
Figma, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $1.1 billion, up 41.0% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 48.3%, EPS was flat and free cash flow fell 16.8%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow FIG
Figma, Inc. (FIG) Altman Z-score
Figma, Inc.'s Altman Z-score for fiscal 2025 is 7.43, in the safe zone (above 2.99).
Altman Z-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Altman Z-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 7.43 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Component | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital / total assets | 0.52 | — | 0.63 | |
| Retained earnings / total assets | (0.61) | — | −0.86 | |
| EBIT / total assets | (0.55) | — | −1.81 | |
| Market value of equity / total liabilities | 15.04 | — | 9.02 | |
| Sales / total assets | 0.45 | — | 0.45 | |
| Altman Z-score | Safe zone | 7.43 | ||
| Z″ Variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies (drops the sales/assets term, uses book equity) | Distress zone | −0.37 | ||
Z and Z″ put Figma, Inc. in different zones: safe zone by Z, distress zone by Z″.
How the Altman Z-score works
Z = 1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets (Altman, 1968). The market value of equity is the close on the last trading day of the fiscal year times weighted basic shares.
Z″ = 6.56 × working capital ÷ total assets + 3.26 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 6.72 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 1.05 × book equity ÷ total liabilities (Altman, Hartzell and Peck, 1995), the variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies.
| Zone | Z | Z″ |
|---|---|---|
| Safe zone | above 2.99 | above 2.60 |
| Grey zone | 1.81–2.99 | 1.10–2.60 |
| Distress zone | below 1.81 | below 1.10 |
Not worked out for banks, insurers and REITs, whose balance sheets the model does not describe, nor when a figure is missing or there is no share price in the week to the fiscal year end.
Altman Z-score against peers
| Company | Altman Z-score |
|---|---|
| MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc. compare | 15.1× |
| FROG JFrog Ltd. compare | 9.7× |
| HUBS HubSpot, Inc. compare | 7.9× |
| FIG Figma, Inc. | 7.4× |
| GWRE Guidewire Software, Inc. compare | 6.0× |
| CHYM Chime Financial, Inc. compare | 4.1× |
| BSY Bentley Systems, Incorporated compare | 3.6× |
| PAYC Paycom Software, Inc. compare | 1.9× |
| GRAB Grab Holdings Limited compare | 0.9× |
What Altman Z-score is
The Altman Z-Score weighs working capital, retained earnings, operating profit, market value and sales against assets and debts to gauge the risk of distress.
1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets