Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
EPAC Industrials Specialty Industrial Machinery
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended August 2025) was $616.9 million, up 4.65% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to May 2026, revenue grew 5.60%, EPS grew 41.5%, free cash flow grew 4.70% and total debt fell 3.19%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for ten consecutive years, operating cash flow growth for three.
Follow EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) Altman Z-score
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.'s Altman Z-score for fiscal 2025 is 5.59, in the safe zone (above 2.99).
Altman Z-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Altman Z-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 5.59 | (0.02) |
| FY2024 | 5.61 | 0.24 |
| FY2023 | 5.37 | 0.82 |
| FY2022 | 4.55 | (0.47) |
| FY2021 | 5.02 | 0.82 |
| FY2020 | 4.21 | 0.89 |
| FY2019 | 3.31 | (0.05) |
| FY2018 | 3.36 | 0.98 |
| FY2017 | 2.38 | (0.59) |
| FY2016 | 2.97 | (0.13) |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Component | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital / total assets | 0.29 | — | 0.35 | |
| Retained earnings / total assets | 0.34 | — | 0.48 | |
| EBIT / total assets | 0.16 | — | 0.53 | |
| Market value of equity / total liabilities | 5.81 | — | 3.48 | |
| Sales / total assets | 0.75 | — | 0.75 | |
| Altman Z-score | Safe zone | 5.59 | ||
| Z″ Variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies (drops the sales/assets term, uses book equity) | Safe zone | 5.25 | ||
How the Altman Z-score works
Z = 1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets (Altman, 1968). The market value of equity is the close on the last trading day of the fiscal year times weighted basic shares.
Z″ = 6.56 × working capital ÷ total assets + 3.26 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 6.72 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 1.05 × book equity ÷ total liabilities (Altman, Hartzell and Peck, 1995), the variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies.
| Zone | Z | Z″ |
|---|---|---|
| Safe zone | above 2.99 | above 2.60 |
| Grey zone | 1.81–2.99 | 1.10–2.60 |
| Distress zone | below 1.81 | below 1.10 |
Not worked out for banks, insurers and REITs, whose balance sheets the model does not describe, nor when a figure is missing or there is no share price in the week to the fiscal year end.
Altman Z-score against peers
| Company | Altman Z-score |
|---|---|
| PSIX Power Solutions International, Inc. compare | 6.4× |
| EPAC Enerpac Tool Group Corp. | 5.6× |
| KAI Kadant Inc compare | 4.7× |
| AMSC American Superconductor Corporation compare | 3.8× |
| GRC Gorman-Rupp Company (The) compare | 3.7× |
| TNC Tennant Company compare | 3.3× |
| HLIO Helios Technologies, Inc compare | 3.2× |
| SMR NuScale Power Corporation compare | 3.2× |
| ATS ATS Corporation compare | 2.1× |
What Altman Z-score is
The Altman Z-Score weighs working capital, retained earnings, operating profit, market value and sales against assets and debts to gauge the risk of distress.
1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets