Curtiss-Wright Corporation
CW Industrials Aerospace & Defense
Curtiss-Wright Corporation’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $3.5 billion, up 12.1% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 5.41%, EPS grew 27.4%, free cash flow grew 37.0% and total debt was flat, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for ten consecutive years, revenue growth for five, operating cash flow growth for three; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) Piotroski F-score
Curtiss-Wright Corporation's Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 8 out of 9: 8 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, up from 7 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 8 | 1.00 |
| FY2024 | 7 | (2.00) |
| FY2023 | 9 | 2.00 |
| FY2022 | 7 | (1.00) |
| FY2021 | 8 | 4.00 |
| FY2020 | 4 | (3.00) |
| FY2019 | 7 | (1.00) |
| FY2018 | 8 | (1.00) |
| FY2017 | 9 | 2.00 |
| FY2016 | 7 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 9.49% | 8.43% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 643.40m | 544.28m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 9.49% | 8.43% | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | 159.17m | 139.30m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.15 | 0.20 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.44 | 1.69 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 37,417,000 | 38,153,000 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising gross margin | 37.20% | 36.96% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.69 | 0.65 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Strong — most fundamentals improved | 8 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| HII Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. compare | 9 |
| CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 8 |
| WWD Woodward, Inc. compare | 8 |
| EMBJ Embraer-Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica compare | 7 |
| TXT Textron Inc. compare | 7 |
| MOG.A Moog Inc. compare | 6 |
| BWXT BWX Technologies, Inc. compare | 5 |
| RKLB Rocket Lab Corporation compare | 5 |
| FTAI FTAI Aviation Ltd. compare | 5 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover