Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.
BWMN Industrials Engineering & Construction
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $490.0 million, up 14.9% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 19.7%, EPS fell 57.1%, free cash flow fell 457.9% and total debt rose 103.2%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Revenue growth for five consecutive years, operating cash flow growth for three.
Follow BWMN
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) Piotroski F-score
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 5 out of 9: 5 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 7 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 5 | (2.00) |
| FY2024 | 7 | 4.00 |
| FY2023 | 3 | (3.00) |
| FY2022 | 6 | 1.00 |
| FY2021 | 5 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 2.25% | 0.62% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 35.83m | 24.30m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 2.25% | 0.62% | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | 23.60m | 21.50m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.11 | 0.08 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 0.99 | 1.31 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 16,414,800 | 15,754,300 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 53.37% | 52.23% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.90 | 0.94 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 5 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| WLDN Willdan Group, Inc. compare | 7 |
| ORN Orion Group Holdings, Inc. compare | 7 |
| MTRX Matrix Service Company compare | 6 |
| CDLR Cadeler A/S Sponsored ADR compare | 6 |
| BWMN Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. | 5 |
| BBCP CONCRETE PUMPING HOLDINGS, INC. compare | 5 |
| AMRC Ameresco, Inc. compare | 3 |
| PHOE Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited compare | 2 |
| CDNL Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover