Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
BAH Industrials Consulting Services
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation’s revenue for fiscal 2026 (year ended March 2026) was $11.2 billion, down 6.37% from fiscal 2025. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue fell 4.24%, EPS fell 24.9%, free cash flow grew 171.9% and total debt fell 1.08%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for ten consecutive years.
Follow BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) Piotroski F-score
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation's Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2026 is 5 out of 9: 5 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 8 in fiscal 2025.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | 5 | (3.00) |
| FY2025 | 8 | 1.00 |
| FY2024 | 7 | 0.00 |
| FY2023 | 7 | 3.00 |
| FY2022 | 4 | (3.00) |
| FY2021 | 7 | 1.00 |
| FY2020 | 6 | (2.00) |
| FY2019 | 8 | 2.00 |
| FY2018 | 6 | 1.00 |
| FY2017 | 5 | — |
How fiscal 2026’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 11.79% | 13.48% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 1.04b | 1.01b | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 11.79% | 13.48% | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 190.00m | 74.00m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.54 | 0.56 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.78 | 1.79 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 122,072,000 | 127,763,000 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising gross margin | 52.71% | 54.77% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 1.55 | 1.73 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 5 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| EFX Equifax, Inc. compare | 8 |
| ICFI ICF International, Inc. compare | 7 |
| CRAI Charles River Associates compare | 7 |
| VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. compare | 6 |
| HURN Huron Consulting Group Inc. compare | 6 |
| BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 5 |
| FCN FTI Consulting, Inc. compare | 5 |
| ROMA Roma Green Finance Limited compare | 3 |
| SBC SBC Medical Group Holdings Incorporated compare | 3 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover