Quaker Houghton (KWR) vs Minerals Technologies Inc. (MTX)
Quaker Houghton and Minerals Technologies Inc. are both Specialty Chemicals companies. Quaker Houghton is the larger, with a market value of $2.7B against $2.1B — 1.3× the size. Minerals Technologies Inc. has negative trailing earnings, so its P/E is not meaningful; Quaker Houghton trades at 29.1×. Quaker Houghton grew revenue faster over the last twelve months: 7.79% against 4.06%. Quaker Houghton has the higher net margin (4.94% vs −3.13%) and the higher return on invested capital (4.53% vs −0.82%). Both pay a dividend; Minerals Technologies Inc. yields more (0.57% vs 0.48%). Across the 21 metrics below, Quaker Houghton leads on 13 and Minerals Technologies Inc. on 8.
Valuation
Profitability
| Metric | KWR | MTX | Specialty Chemicals median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.06% | 24.52% | 29.23% |
| Operating margin | 7.70% | (1.34%) | 3.63% |
| Net margin | 4.94% | (3.13%) | 2.89% |
| Free cash flow margin | 3.78% | 5.92% | 3.78% |
| Return on equity | 7.17% | (4.12%) | 3.62% |
| Return on assets | 3.43% | (1.93%) | 0.35% |
| Return on invested capital | 4.53% | (0.82%) | 2.75% |
Growth
Health
Dividend
Size
Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack