FitLife Brands Inc. (FTLF) vs Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF)

FitLife Brands Inc. and Laird Superfood, Inc. are both Packaged Foods companies. FitLife Brands Inc. is the larger, with a market value of $87.2M against $39.4M — 2.2× the size. Laird Superfood, Inc. has negative trailing earnings, so its P/E is not meaningful; FitLife Brands Inc. trades at 14.0×. Laird Superfood, Inc. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months: 73.3% against 60.6%. FitLife Brands Inc. has the higher net margin (6.15% vs −4.62%) and the higher return on invested capital (8.17% vs −4.90%). Across the 19 metrics below, FitLife Brands Inc. leads on 12 and Laird Superfood, Inc. on 7.

Valuation

Metric FTLF LSF Packaged Foods median
P/E 14.03 n/m 12.69
P/S 0.86 0.47 0.61
P/B 1.84 3.45 1.47
Price to free cash flow 8.70 n/m 8.50
EV/EBITDA 9.54 n/m 8.20
EV/Sales 1.22 0.19 0.85
Earnings yield 7.13% (10.08%) 0.00%
Free cash flow yield 11.49% (3.21%) 6.05%

Profitability

Metric FTLF LSF Packaged Foods median
Gross margin 36.54% 32.41% 27.54%
Operating margin 10.86% (9.43%) 0.00%
Net margin 6.15% (4.62%) 0.00%
Free cash flow margin 9.91% (1.47%) 2.56%
Return on equity 14.11% (30.84%) 0.00%
Return on assets 7.53% (4.53%) 0.00%
Return on invested capital 8.17% (4.90%) 0.00%

Growth

Metric FTLF LSF Packaged Foods median
Revenue growth (TTM) 60.61% 73.26% 5.69%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) (30.77%) (72.22%) —
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR 29.80% 14.11% 3.81%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR (6.44%) 0.00% 0.00%

Health

Metric FTLF LSF Packaged Foods median
Debt to equity 0.80 0.00 0.26
Current ratio 1.46 3.05 1.64
Net debt to EBITDA 3.71 2.13 0.87

Dividend

Metric FTLF LSF Packaged Foods median
Dividend yield — — 3.21%
Payout ratio — 0.00 0.00

Size

Metric FTLF LSF Packaged Foods median
Market cap 87.15m 39.40m 245.45m

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack