Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. and TeraWulf Inc. are both Capital Markets companies. TeraWulf Inc. is the larger, with a market value of $8.3B against $7.4B — 1.1× the size. TeraWulf Inc. has negative trailing earnings, so its P/E is not meaningful; Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. trades at 20.7×. Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. has the higher net margin (26.5% vs −1,179.9%) and the higher return on invested capital (14.9% vs −9.95%). Across the 16 metrics below, Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. leads on 15 and TeraWulf Inc. on 1.
Valuation
Profitability
| Metric | FIGR | WULF | Capital Markets median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 87.54% | 69.26% | 62.80% |
| Operating margin | 28.41% | (250.37%) | 0.00% |
| Net margin | 26.49% | (1,179.94%) | (0.55%) |
| Free cash flow margin | (14.84%) | (1,453.34%) | 0.00% |
| Return on equity | 21.14% | (1,247.13%) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 12.45% | (43.71%) | 0.00% |
| Return on invested capital | 14.94% | (9.95%) | 0.00% |
Growth
Health
Dividend
Size
Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack