Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. (FIGR) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)
- Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. FIGR 27.20 −1.70%
- TeraWulf Inc. WULF 11.71 −7.21%
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. and TeraWulf Inc. are both Capital Markets companies. Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. and TeraWulf Inc. are of similar size ($6.3B and $6.2B). TeraWulf Inc. has negative trailing earnings, so its P/E is not meaningful; Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. trades at 17.7×. Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. has the higher net margin (26.5% vs −1,179.9%) and the higher return on invested capital (14.9% vs −9.95%). Across the 15 metrics below, Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. leads on 14 and TeraWulf Inc. on 1.
Valuation
Profitability
| Metric | FIGR | WULF | Capital Markets median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 87.54% | 69.26% | 62.80% |
| Operating margin | 28.41% | (250.37%) | 0.00% |
| Net margin | 26.49% | (1,179.94%) | (0.55%) |
| Free cash flow margin | (14.84%) | (1,453.34%) | 0.00% |
| Return on equity | 21.14% | (1,247.13%) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 12.45% | (43.71%) | 0.00% |
| Return on invested capital | 14.94% | (9.95%) | 0.00% |
Growth
Health
Dividend
Size
Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack