China Automotive Systems, Inc. (CAAS) vs Stoneridge, Inc. (SRI)
China Automotive Systems, Inc. and Stoneridge, Inc. are both Auto Parts companies. Stoneridge, Inc. is the larger, with a market value of $194.2M against $150.6M — 1.3× the size. Stoneridge, Inc. has negative trailing earnings, so its P/E is not meaningful; China Automotive Systems, Inc. trades at 5.0×. Stoneridge, Inc. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months: 21.4% against 17.1%. China Automotive Systems, Inc. has the higher net margin (4.21% vs −13.3%) and the higher return on invested capital (6.80% vs −11.0%). Across the 19 metrics below, China Automotive Systems, Inc. leads on 15 and Stoneridge, Inc. on 4.
Valuation
Profitability
| Metric | CAAS | SRI | Auto Parts median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 16.51% | 19.10% | 22.64% |
| Operating margin | 5.95% | (4.49%) | 3.67% |
| Net margin | 4.21% | (13.32%) | 1.68% |
| Free cash flow margin | 2.47% | (0.18%) | 2.31% |
| Return on equity | 7.25% | (58.33%) | 2.35% |
| Return on assets | 3.60% | (20.85%) | 0.89% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.80% | (11.01%) | 4.55% |
Growth
Health
Dividend
Size
Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack