Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) vs Shimmick Corporation (SHIM)

Blink Charging Co. and Shimmick Corporation are both Engineering & Construction companies. Shimmick Corporation is the larger, with a market value of $138.1M against $81.2M — 1.7× the size. Blink Charging Co. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months: −5.92% against −16.0%. Shimmick Corporation has the higher net margin (−3.81% vs −52.5%) and the higher return on invested capital (−35.8% vs −231.9%). Across the 16 metrics below, Shimmick Corporation leads on 11 and Blink Charging Co. on 5.

Valuation

Metric BLNK SHIM Engineering & Construction median
P/E n/m n/m 28.59
P/S 0.85 0.28 1.15
P/B 1.72 n/m 3.96
Price to free cash flow n/m n/m 25.24
EV/EBITDA n/m 51.87 14.87
EV/Sales 0.50 0.43 1.42
Earnings yield (70.32%) (13.98%) 2.47%
Free cash flow yield (7.36%) (37.72%) 1.91%

Profitability

Metric BLNK SHIM Engineering & Construction median
Gross margin 29.71% 10.10% 18.76%
Operating margin (52.99%) (1.92%) 6.26%
Net margin (52.48%) (3.81%) 2.23%
Free cash flow margin (6.27%) (10.71%) 1.83%
Return on equity (85.48%) 33.38% 7.90%
Return on assets (34.85%) (7.78%) 0.87%
Return on invested capital (231.88%) (35.84%) 2.52%

Growth

Metric BLNK SHIM Engineering & Construction median
Revenue growth (TTM) (5.92%) (15.98%) 16.67%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) 61.22% 81.95% —
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR 75.43% — 11.76%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR 0.00% — 0.00%

Health

Metric BLNK SHIM Engineering & Construction median
Debt to equity 0.00 (1.65) 0.40
Current ratio 1.17 1.00 1.39
Net debt to EBITDA 0.70 (8.51) 0.38

Dividend

Metric BLNK SHIM Engineering & Construction median
Dividend yield — — 0.65%
Payout ratio 0.00 — 0.00

Size

Metric BLNK SHIM Engineering & Construction median
Market cap 81.16m 138.06m 1.31b

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack