Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) vs Shimmick Corporation (SHIM)

Blink Charging Co. and Shimmick Corporation are both Engineering & Construction companies. Shimmick Corporation is the larger, with a market value of $104.6M against $64.2M — 1.6× the size. Blink Charging Co. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months: −5.92% against −16.0%. Shimmick Corporation has the higher net margin (−3.81% vs −52.5%) and the higher return on invested capital (−35.8% vs −231.9%). Across the 16 metrics below, Shimmick Corporation leads on 10 and Blink Charging Co. on 6.

Valuation

Metric BLNK SHIM Engineering & Construction median
P/E n/m n/m 29.24
P/S 0.63 0.21 1.09
P/B 1.27 n/m 3.39
Price to free cash flow n/m n/m 24.81
EV/EBITDA n/m 43.31 14.38
EV/Sales 0.28 0.36 1.37
Earnings yield (95.43%) (18.67%) 2.83%
Free cash flow yield (9.99%) (50.40%) 2.28%

Profitability

Metric BLNK SHIM Engineering & Construction median
Gross margin 29.71% 10.10% 18.76%
Operating margin (52.99%) (1.92%) 6.26%
Net margin (52.48%) (3.81%) 2.23%
Free cash flow margin (6.27%) (10.71%) 1.83%
Return on equity (85.48%) 33.38% 7.90%
Return on assets (34.85%) (7.78%) 0.87%
Return on invested capital (231.88%) (35.84%) 2.52%

Growth

Metric BLNK SHIM Engineering & Construction median
Revenue growth (TTM) (5.92%) (15.98%) 16.67%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) 61.22% 81.95% 13.42%
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR 75.43% — 11.76%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR 0.00% — 0.00%

Health

Metric BLNK SHIM Engineering & Construction median
Debt to equity 0.00 (1.65) 0.40
Current ratio 1.17 1.00 1.39
Net debt to EBITDA 0.70 (8.51) 0.38

Dividend

Metric BLNK SHIM Engineering & Construction median
Dividend yield — — 0.63%
Payout ratio — — 0.17

Size

Metric BLNK SHIM Engineering & Construction median
Market cap 64.22m 104.58m 1.09b

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack