Pricing Log in Create free account

BioHarvest Sciences Inc. (BHST) vs FitLife Brands Inc. (FTLF)

BioHarvest Sciences Inc. and FitLife Brands Inc. are both Packaged Foods companies. FitLife Brands Inc. is the larger, with a market value of $75.1M against $33.8M — 2.2× the size. BioHarvest Sciences Inc. has negative trailing earnings, so its P/E is not meaningful; FitLife Brands Inc. trades at 12.1×. FitLife Brands Inc. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months: 60.6% against 17.5%. FitLife Brands Inc. has the higher net margin (6.15% vs −31.2%) and the higher return on invested capital (8.17% vs −64.3%). Across the 19 metrics below, FitLife Brands Inc. leads on 12 and BioHarvest Sciences Inc. on 7.

Valuation

Metric BHST FTLF Packaged Foods median
P/E n/m 12.12 12.84
P/S 0.93 0.74 0.67
P/B 1.66 1.59 1.58
Price to free cash flow n/m 7.52 8.97
EV/EBITDA n/m 8.63 8.34
EV/Sales 0.57 1.11 0.97
Earnings yield (35.86%) 8.25% 2.16%
Free cash flow yield (32.72%) 13.30% 5.54%

Profitability

Metric BHST FTLF Packaged Foods median
Gross margin 58.95% 36.54% 28.37%
Operating margin (17.99%) 10.86% 2.53%
Net margin (31.21%) 6.15% 0.53%
Free cash flow margin (30.31%) 9.91% 2.31%
Return on equity (142.50%) 14.11% 0.00%
Return on assets (30.60%) 7.53% 0.00%
Return on invested capital (64.30%) 8.17% 0.00%

Growth

Metric BHST FTLF Packaged Foods median
Revenue growth (TTM) 17.50% 60.61% 3.59%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) 25.00% (30.77%) 4.57%
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR 144.37% 29.80% 3.81%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR 0.00% (6.44%) 0.00%

Health

Metric BHST FTLF Packaged Foods median
Debt to equity 0.13 0.80 0.18
Current ratio 2.24 1.46 1.84
Net debt to EBITDA 5.18 3.71 0.73

Dividend

Metric BHST FTLF Packaged Foods median
Dividend yield — — 3.68%
Payout ratio — — 0.62

Size

Metric BHST FTLF Packaged Foods median
Market cap 33.78m 75.13m 268.23m

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack