Benson Hill, Inc. (BHILQ) vs Metabolix, Inc. (YTENQ)

Benson Hill, Inc. and Metabolix, Inc. are both Agricultural Inputs companies. Benson Hill, Inc. and Metabolix, Inc. are of similar size ($1.5M and $1.5M). Benson Hill, Inc. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months: 139.6% against 74.2%. Benson Hill, Inc. has the higher net margin (−21.8% vs −1,416.1%) and the lower return on invested capital (−57.8% vs 0.00%). Across the 13 metrics below, Benson Hill, Inc. leads on 8 and Metabolix, Inc. on 5.

Valuation

Metric BHILQ YTENQ Agricultural Inputs median
P/E n/m n/m 15.82
P/S n/m n/m 0.85
P/B n/m n/m 0.80
Price to free cash flow n/m n/m 13.58
EV/EBITDA n/m n/m 6.55
EV/Sales 0.15 1.07 1.07
Earnings yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Free cash flow yield 0.00% 0.00% 2.54%

Profitability

Metric BHILQ YTENQ Agricultural Inputs median
Gross margin 4.29% 66.44% 30.83%
Operating margin (19.41%) (1,403.90%) 0.30%
Net margin (21.80%) (1,416.05%) (7.81%)
Free cash flow margin (3.50%) (646.49%) 1.46%
Return on equity (138.16%) 449.55% (2.64%)
Return on assets (41.53%) (287.44%) (5.16%)
Return on invested capital (57.78%) 0.00% 0.00%

Growth

Metric BHILQ YTENQ Agricultural Inputs median
Revenue growth (TTM) 139.60% 74.17% 8.74%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) 14.08% 34.06% —
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR — (35.94%) 3.77%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Health

Metric BHILQ YTENQ Agricultural Inputs median
Debt to equity 3.19 0.00 0.47
Current ratio 2.21 0.16 1.55
Net debt to EBITDA (1.32) 0.08 0.16

Dividend

Metric BHILQ YTENQ Agricultural Inputs median
Dividend yield — — 4.12%
Payout ratio 0.00 0.00 0.05

Size

Metric BHILQ YTENQ Agricultural Inputs median
Market cap 1.52m 1.52m 269.62m

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack