Benson Hill, Inc. (BHILQ) vs Nexentis Technologies Inc. (NXTS)

Benson Hill, Inc. and Nexentis Technologies Inc. are both Agricultural Inputs companies. Nexentis Technologies Inc. is the larger, with a market value of $2.1M against $1.5M — 1.4× the size. Benson Hill, Inc. has negative trailing earnings, so its P/E is not meaningful; Nexentis Technologies Inc. trades at 0.1×. Benson Hill, Inc. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months: 139.6% against −194.1%. Nexentis Technologies Inc. has the higher net margin (9,713.3% vs −21.8%) and the higher return on invested capital (0.00% vs −57.8%). Across the 15 metrics below, Nexentis Technologies Inc. leads on 9 and Benson Hill, Inc. on 6.

Valuation

Metric BHILQ NXTS Agricultural Inputs median
P/E n/m 0.11 15.82
P/S n/m n/m 0.85
P/B n/m 0.67 0.80
Price to free cash flow n/m n/m 13.58
EV/EBITDA n/m 0.67 6.55
EV/Sales 0.15 44.23 1.07
Earnings yield 0.00% 894.54% 0.00%
Free cash flow yield 0.00% (376.35%) 2.54%

Profitability

Metric BHILQ NXTS Agricultural Inputs median
Gross margin 4.29% 143.64% 30.83%
Operating margin (19.41%) 6,787.88% 0.30%
Net margin (21.80%) 9,713.33% (7.81%)
Free cash flow margin (3.50%) 2,736.36% 1.46%
Return on equity (138.16%) (437.12%) (2.64%)
Return on assets (41.53%) (121.21%) (5.16%)
Return on invested capital (57.78%) 0.00% 0.00%

Growth

Metric BHILQ NXTS Agricultural Inputs median
Revenue growth (TTM) 139.60% (194.07%) 8.74%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) 14.08% 72.33% —
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR — 3.62% 3.77%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Health

Metric BHILQ NXTS Agricultural Inputs median
Debt to equity 3.19 0.24 0.47
Current ratio 2.21 3.72 1.55
Net debt to EBITDA (1.32) 0.75 0.16

Dividend

Metric BHILQ NXTS Agricultural Inputs median
Dividend yield — — 4.12%
Payout ratio 0.00 0.00 0.05

Size

Metric BHILQ NXTS Agricultural Inputs median
Market cap 1.52m 2.12m 269.62m

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack