Benson Hill, Inc. (BHILQ) vs FMC Corporation (FMC)

Benson Hill, Inc. and FMC Corporation are both Agricultural Inputs companies. FMC Corporation is the larger, with a market value of $944.2M against $1.5M — 621.2× the size. Benson Hill, Inc. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months: 139.6% against −22.0%. Benson Hill, Inc. has the higher net margin (−21.8% vs −151.2%) and the lower return on invested capital (−57.8% vs −49.4%). Across the 15 metrics below, Benson Hill, Inc. leads on 10 and FMC Corporation on 5.

Valuation

Metric BHILQ FMC Agricultural Inputs median
P/E n/m n/m 14.64
P/S n/m 0.29 0.78
P/B n/m 84.73 0.80
Price to free cash flow n/m 2.72 10.41
EV/EBITDA n/m n/m 5.38
EV/Sales 0.15 1.51 1.07
Earnings yield 0.00% (545.79%) 0.00%
Free cash flow yield 0.00% 36.72% 5.69%

Profitability

Metric BHILQ FMC Agricultural Inputs median
Gross margin 4.29% 21.96% 29.38%
Operating margin (19.41%) (96.97%) 0.60%
Net margin (21.80%) (151.18%) (9.43%)
Free cash flow margin (3.50%) 10.50% 3.70%
Return on equity (138.16%) (223.37%) 0.00%
Return on assets (41.53%) (42.58%) 0.00%
Return on invested capital (57.78%) (49.43%) 1.70%

Growth

Metric BHILQ FMC Agricultural Inputs median
Revenue growth (TTM) 139.60% (21.99%) 8.63%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) 14.08% (757.35%) 23.08%
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR — (5.67%) 4.64%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Health

Metric BHILQ FMC Agricultural Inputs median
Debt to equity 3.19 439.76 0.51
Current ratio 2.21 1.66 1.58
Net debt to EBITDA (1.32) (2.40) 0.25

Dividend

Metric BHILQ FMC Agricultural Inputs median
Dividend yield — 5.29% 3.99%
Payout ratio — — 0.67

Size

Metric BHILQ FMC Agricultural Inputs median
Market cap 1.52m 944.24m 998.68m

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack