Pricing Log in Create free account

Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited (BAOS) vs Bloomia Holdings, Inc. (TULP)

Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited and Bloomia Holdings, Inc. are both Advertising Agencies companies. Bloomia Holdings, Inc. is the larger, with a market value of $10.2M against $6.4M — 1.6× the size. Bloomia Holdings, Inc. has negative trailing earnings, so its P/E is not meaningful; Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited trades at 5.8×. Across the 11 metrics below, Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited leads on 8 and Bloomia Holdings, Inc. on 3.

Valuation

Metric BAOS TULP Advertising Agencies median
P/E 5.85 n/m 20.12
P/S n/m 0.12 0.72
P/B n/m 0.42 1.22
Price to free cash flow n/m n/m 8.69
EV/EBITDA n/m n/m 12.89
EV/Sales n/m 0.57 1.05
Earnings yield 17.10% (195.59%) (4.37%)
Free cash flow yield 0.00% (86.60%) 0.00%

Profitability

Metric BAOS TULP Advertising Agencies median
Gross margin — 16.39% 42.75%
Operating margin — (35.04%) 0.00%
Net margin — (23.23%) (7.63%)
Free cash flow margin 0.00% (9.17%) 0.00%
Return on equity 0.00% (78.11%) 0.00%
Return on assets 0.00% (12.26%) 0.00%
Return on invested capital 0.00% (29.52%) 0.00%

Growth

Metric BAOS TULP Advertising Agencies median
Revenue growth (TTM) — 35.11% 5.73%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) 55.28% (201.36%) 34.44%
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR (45.57%) 19.80% 4.53%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Health

Metric BAOS TULP Advertising Agencies median
Debt to equity 0.00 1.69 0.04
Current ratio 0.75 1.69 1.46
Net debt to EBITDA 0.22 (1.67) 0.01

Dividend

Metric BAOS TULP Advertising Agencies median
Dividend yield — — 3.97%
Payout ratio — — —

Size

Metric BAOS TULP Advertising Agencies median
Market cap 6.41m 10.19m 54.09m

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack