Silgan Holdings Inc.
SLGN Consumer Cyclical Packaging & Containers
Silgan Holdings Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $6.5 billion, up 10.7% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 6.76%, EPS fell 13.3%, free cash flow grew 12.1% and total debt fell 4.32%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for five consecutive years; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) Piotroski F-score
Silgan Holdings Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 7 out of 9: 7 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, up from 6 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 7 | 1.00 |
| FY2024 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2023 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2022 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2021 | 6 | (1.00) |
| FY2020 | 7 | 2.00 |
| FY2019 | 5 | 1.00 |
| FY2018 | 4 | (3.00) |
| FY2017 | 7 | 3.00 |
| FY2016 | 4 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 3.21% | 3.41% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 729.84m | 721.87m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 3.21% | 3.41% | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 441.44m | 445.50m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.41 | 0.42 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.22 | 1.12 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 106,541,000 | 106,794,000 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising gross margin | 17.73% | 17.28% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.72 | 0.72 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Strong — most fundamentals improved | 7 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| CCK Crown Holdings, Inc. compare | 8 |
| SLGN Silgan Holdings Inc. | 7 |
| SON Sonoco Products Company compare | 6 |
| GEF.B Greif Inc. compare | 5 |
| TRS TriMas Corporation compare | 5 |
| AMBP Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. compare | 5 |
| GEF Greif, Inc. compare | 5 |
| GPK Graphic Packaging Holding Company compare | 5 |
| REYN Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. compare | 4 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover