RPM International Inc.
RPM Basic Materials Specialty Chemicals
RPM International Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2026 (year ended May 2026) was $7.9 billion, up 6.66% from fiscal 2025. In the quarter to August 2026, revenue grew 4.82%, EPS grew 13.8%, free cash flow grew 33.1% and total debt fell 9.85%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for twenty-five consecutive years, revenue growth for five.
Follow RPM
RPM International Inc. (RPM) Piotroski F-score
RPM International Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2026 is 6 out of 9: 6 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, down from 7 in fiscal 2025.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2026 | 6 | (1.00) |
| FY2025 | 7 | 0.00 |
| FY2024 | 7 | 0.00 |
| FY2023 | 7 | 2.00 |
| FY2022 | 5 | (3.00) |
| FY2021 | 8 | 1.00 |
| FY2020 | 7 | 1.00 |
| FY2019 | 6 | 0.00 |
| FY2018 | 6 | 2.00 |
| FY2017 | 4 | — |
How fiscal 2026’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 8.17% | 9.55% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 898.71m | 768.19m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 8.17% | 9.55% | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 239.90m | 82.13m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.26 | 0.37 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.68 | 2.16 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 127,049,000 | 127,570,000 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising gross margin | 41.44% | 41.38% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.98 | 1.03 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 6 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| ESI Element Solutions Inc. compare | 7 |
| SSL Sasol Ltd. compare | 7 |
| RPM RPM International Inc. | 6 |
| DD DuPont de Nemours, Inc. compare | 6 |
| ALB Albemarle Corporation compare | 6 |
| SQM Sociedad Quimica y Minera S.A. compare | 6 |
| NEU NewMarket Corporation compare | 5 |
| WLK Westlake Corporation compare | 3 |
| SOLS Solstice Advanced Materials Inc. compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover