Red Violet, Inc.
RDVT Technology Software Application
Red Violet, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $90.3 million, up 20.0% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 22.7%, EPS grew 84.2%, free cash flow grew 50.4% and total debt fell 3.69%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Revenue growth for five consecutive years, operating cash flow growth for five; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow RDVT
Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) Piotroski F-score
Red Violet, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 8 out of 9: 8 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, up from 7 in fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 8 | 1.00 |
| FY2024 | 7 | (1.00) |
| FY2023 | 8 | 2.00 |
| FY2022 | 6 | (2.00) |
| FY2021 | 8 | 2.00 |
| FY2020 | 6 | 1.00 |
| FY2019 | 5 | (1.00) |
| FY2018 | 6 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 12.50% | 7.31% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 29.35m | 23.96m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 12.50% | 7.31% | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | 16.20m | 16.96m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.00 | 0.00 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 7.18 | 4.48 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 14,036,900 | 13,864,800 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 83.74% | 81.38% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.86 | 0.79 | Pass | 1 |
| Piotroski F-score | Strong — most fundamentals improved | 8 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| PD PagerDuty compare | 8 |
| RDVT Red Violet, Inc. | 8 |
| GTM ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. compare | 7 |
| APPS Digital Turbine, Inc. compare | 7 |
| DFIN Donnelley Financial Solutions compare | 6 |
| RSKD Riskified Ltd. compare | 6 |
| CXM Sprinklr, Inc. compare | 6 |
| IBTA Ibotta, Inc. compare | 4 |
| WRD WeRide Inc. compare | 4 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover