Ryder System, Inc.
R Industrials Rental & Leasing Services
Ryder System, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $12.7 billion, roughly unchanged from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 4.95%, EPS grew 8.31%, free cash flow grew 104.0% and total debt fell 3.49%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for twenty-five consecutive years.
Follow R
Ryder System, Inc. (R) Piotroski F-score
Ryder System, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 7 out of 9: 7 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, unchanged from fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 7 | 0.00 |
| FY2024 | 7 | 3.00 |
| FY2023 | 4 | (4.00) |
| FY2022 | 8 | 0.00 |
| FY2021 | 8 | 4.00 |
| FY2020 | 4 | 1.00 |
| FY2019 | 3 | (2.00) |
| FY2018 | 5 | (3.00) |
| FY2017 | 8 | 4.00 |
| FY2016 | 4 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 3.02% | 3.01% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 2.59b | 2.27b | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 3.02% | 3.01% | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | 2.10b | 1.78b | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.41 | 0.41 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising current ratio | 0.89 | 0.75 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 40,799,000 | 43,079,000 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising gross margin | 20.18% | 19.57% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.77 | 0.78 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Strong — most fundamentals improved | 7 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| AER Aercap Holdings N.V. compare | 8 |
| R Ryder System, Inc. | 7 |
| MGRC McGrath RentCorp compare | 7 |
| CAR Avis Budget Group, Inc. compare | 6 |
| GATX GATX Corporation compare | 5 |
| UHAL U-Haul Holding Company compare | 4 |
| WSC WillScot Holdings Corporation compare | 4 |
| HRI Herc Holdings Inc. compare | 3 |
| EQPT EquipmentShare.com Inc. compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover