Lumen Technologies, Inc.
LUMN Communication Services Telecom Services
Lumen Technologies, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $12.4 billion, down 5.39% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue fell 9.28%, EPS grew 78.3%, free cash flow grew 124.3% and total debt fell 26.2%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Dividend growth for three consecutive years; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow LUMN
Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) Piotroski F-score
Lumen Technologies, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 4 out of 9: 4 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, unchanged from fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 4 | 0.00 |
| FY2024 | 4 | (1.00) |
| FY2023 | 5 | 0.00 |
| FY2022 | 5 | (4.00) |
| FY2021 | 9 | 4.00 |
| FY2020 | 5 | 0.00 |
| FY2019 | 5 | 0.00 |
| FY2018 | 5 | 1.00 |
| FY2017 | 4 | (2.00) |
| FY2016 | 6 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (5.13%) | (0.16%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 4.74b | 4.33b | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | (5.13%) | (0.16%) | Fail | 0 |
| Cash flow above net income | 6.48b | 4.39b | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.51 | 0.52 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.80 | 1.21 | Pass | 1 |
| No new shares issued | 994,548,000 | 987,680,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 46.48% | 48.86% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.37 | 0.39 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 4 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| VEON VEON Ltd. compare | 8 |
| AD Array Digital Infrastructure Inc. compare | 7 |
| TIMB TIM S.A. Sponsored ADR compare | 7 |
| TKC Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS compare | 7 |
| TDS Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. compare | 7 |
| IRDM Iridium Communications Inc compare | 7 |
| PHI PLDT Inc. compare | 5 |
| LBTYB Liberty Global Ltd compare | 5 |
| LUMN Lumen Technologies, Inc. | 4 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover