Diamondback Energy, Inc.
FANG Energy Oil & Gas E&P
Diamondback Energy, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $15.0 billion, up 35.8% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 51.2%, EPS grew 179.4%, free cash flow grew 219.2% and total debt fell 16.6%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Member of the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100.
Follow FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) Altman Z-score
Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s Altman Z-score for fiscal 2025 is 1.25, in the distress zone (below 1.81).
Altman Z-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Altman Z-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 1.25 | 0.06 |
| FY2024 | 1.19 | (1.17) |
| FY2023 | 2.36 | (0.24) |
| FY2022 | 2.59 | 0.66 |
| FY2021 | 1.94 | 2.57 |
| FY2020 | −0.63 | (1.98) |
| FY2019 | 1.35 | 0.27 |
| FY2018 | 1.08 | (2.66) |
| FY2017 | 3.74 | 0.05 |
| FY2016 | 3.69 | 0.67 |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Component | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital / total assets | (0.04) | — | −0.05 | |
| Retained earnings / total assets | 0.07 | — | 0.09 | |
| EBIT / total assets | 0.02 | — | 0.06 | |
| Market value of equity / total liabilities | 1.55 | — | 0.93 | |
| Sales / total assets | 0.21 | — | 0.21 | |
| Altman Z-score | Distress zone | 1.25 | ||
| Z″ Variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies (drops the sales/assets term, uses book equity) | Grey zone | 1.70 | ||
Z and Z″ put Diamondback Energy, Inc. in different zones: distress zone by Z, grey zone by Z″.
How the Altman Z-score works
Z = 1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets (Altman, 1968). The market value of equity is the close on the last trading day of the fiscal year times weighted basic shares.
Z″ = 6.56 × working capital ÷ total assets + 3.26 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 6.72 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 1.05 × book equity ÷ total liabilities (Altman, Hartzell and Peck, 1995), the variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies.
| Zone | Z | Z″ |
|---|---|---|
| Safe zone | above 2.99 | above 2.60 |
| Grey zone | 1.81–2.99 | 1.10–2.60 |
| Distress zone | below 1.81 | below 1.10 |
Not worked out for banks, insurers and REITs, whose balance sheets the model does not describe, nor when a figure is missing or there is no share price in the week to the fiscal year end.
Altman Z-score against peers
| Company | Altman Z-score |
|---|---|
| TPL Texas Pacific Land Corporation compare | 75.6× |
| EOG EOG Resources, Inc. compare | 3.3× |
| EXE Expand Energy Corporation compare | 2.6× |
| DVN Devon Energy Corporation compare | 2.2× |
| EQT EQT Corporation compare | 2.0× |
| PR Permian Resources Corporation compare | 1.6× |
| OXY Occidental Petroleum Corporation compare | 1.3× |
| FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 1.2× |
| WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd compare | 1.1× |
What Altman Z-score is
The Altman Z-Score weighs working capital, retained earnings, operating profit, market value and sales against assets and debts to gauge the risk of distress.
1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets
More on FANG
- Revenue
- Net income
- EPS (diluted)
- EBITDA
- Free cash flow
- Operating cash flow
- Gross margin
- Operating margin
- Net margin
- Free cash flow margin
- P/E ratio
- P/S ratio
- P/B ratio
- Price to free cash flow
- EV/EBITDA
- EV/Sales
- EV/FCF
- Return on equity
- Return on assets
- Return on invested capital
- Debt to equity
- Current ratio
- Total debt
- Shares outstanding
- Book value per share
- Revenue growth
- Piotroski F-score
- Beneish M-score
- The full statement