EQT Corporation
EQT Energy Oil & Gas E&P
EQT Corporation’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $8.6 billion, up 63.9% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue fell 29.2%, EPS fell 74.1%, free cash flow fell 42.5% and total debt fell 32.0%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Member of the S&P 500; dividend growth for five consecutive years.
Follow EQT
EQT Corporation (EQT) Altman Z-score
EQT Corporation's Altman Z-score for fiscal 2025 is 1.95, in the grey zone (1.81–2.99).
Altman Z-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Altman Z-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 1.95 | 0.79 |
| FY2024 | 1.16 | (0.40) |
| FY2023 | 1.56 | 0.09 |
| FY2022 | 1.48 | 1.35 |
| FY2021 | 0.13 | (0.15) |
| FY2020 | 0.28 | (0.12) |
| FY2019 | 0.39 | 0.12 |
| FY2018 | 0.27 | (0.38) |
| FY2017 | 0.65 | (0.15) |
| FY2016 | 0.80 | (0.36) |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Component | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital / total assets | (0.01) | — | −0.02 | |
| Retained earnings / total assets | 0.10 | — | 0.14 | |
| EBIT / total assets | 0.08 | — | 0.26 | |
| Market value of equity / total liabilities | 2.27 | — | 1.36 | |
| Sales / total assets | 0.21 | — | 0.21 | |
| Altman Z-score | Grey zone | 1.95 | ||
| Z″ Variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies (drops the sales/assets term, uses book equity) | Safe zone | 2.75 | ||
Z and Z″ put EQT Corporation in different zones: grey zone by Z, safe zone by Z″.
How the Altman Z-score works
Z = 1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets (Altman, 1968). The market value of equity is the close on the last trading day of the fiscal year times weighted basic shares.
Z″ = 6.56 × working capital ÷ total assets + 3.26 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 6.72 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 1.05 × book equity ÷ total liabilities (Altman, Hartzell and Peck, 1995), the variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies.
| Zone | Z | Z″ |
|---|---|---|
| Safe zone | above 2.99 | above 2.60 |
| Grey zone | 1.81–2.99 | 1.10–2.60 |
| Distress zone | below 1.81 | below 1.10 |
Not worked out for banks, insurers and REITs, whose balance sheets the model does not describe, nor when a figure is missing or there is no share price in the week to the fiscal year end.
Altman Z-score against peers
| Company | Altman Z-score |
|---|---|
| TPL Texas Pacific Land Corporation compare | 75.6× |
| EXE Expand Energy Corporation compare | 2.6× |
| DVN Devon Energy Corporation compare | 2.2× |
| EQT EQT Corporation | 2.0× |
| PR Permian Resources Corporation compare | 1.6× |
| APA APA Corporation compare | 1.4× |
| OXY Occidental Petroleum Corporation compare | 1.3× |
| FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. compare | 1.2× |
| WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd compare | 1.1× |
What Altman Z-score is
The Altman Z-Score weighs working capital, retained earnings, operating profit, market value and sales against assets and debts to gauge the risk of distress.
1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets
More on EQT
- Revenue
- Net income
- EPS (diluted)
- EBITDA
- Free cash flow
- Operating cash flow
- Gross margin
- Operating margin
- Net margin
- Free cash flow margin
- P/E ratio
- P/S ratio
- P/B ratio
- Price to free cash flow
- EV/EBITDA
- EV/Sales
- EV/FCF
- Return on equity
- Return on assets
- Return on invested capital
- Debt to equity
- Current ratio
- Total debt
- Shares outstanding
- Book value per share
- Revenue growth
- Piotroski F-score
- Beneish M-score
- The full statement