Pricing Log in Create free account

Vivid Seats Inc. (SEAT) vs Fang Holdings Limited (SFUN)

Vivid Seats Inc. and Fang Holdings Limited are both Internet Content & Information companies. Vivid Seats Inc. is the larger, with a market value of $33.5M against $25.3M — 1.3× the size. Fang Holdings Limited grew revenue faster over the last twelve months: −0.64% against −25.2%. Fang Holdings Limited has the higher net margin (−3.09% vs −60.3%) and the higher return on invested capital (0.00% vs −200.3%). Across the 18 metrics below, Fang Holdings Limited leads on 13 and Vivid Seats Inc. on 5.

Valuation

Metric SEAT SFUN Internet Content & Information median
P/E n/m n/m 11.54
P/S 0.06 0.12 0.86
P/B n/m 0.04 1.20
Price to free cash flow 5.43 0.13 9.63
EV/EBITDA n/m 38.41 8.68
EV/Sales 0.54 1.16 1.18
Earnings yield (1,381.18%) (17.85%) (2.42%)
Free cash flow yield 18.42% 756.06% 2.27%

Profitability

Metric SEAT SFUN Internet Content & Information median
Gross margin 68.33% 91.93% 66.84%
Operating margin (88.41%) 0.00% (3.41%)
Net margin (60.26%) (3.09%) (3.02%)
Free cash flow margin 1.13% 0.00% 1.75%
Return on equity (556.99%) (1.07%) 0.00%
Return on assets (34.02%) (0.36%) (0.36%)
Return on invested capital (200.33%) 0.00% 0.00%

Growth

Metric SEAT SFUN Internet Content & Information median
Revenue growth (TTM) (25.24%) (0.64%) 2.65%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) (5,866.67%) 84.00% 34.45%
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR 74.70% (32.55%) 9.73%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Health

Metric SEAT SFUN Internet Content & Information median
Debt to equity (3.67) 1.10 0.01
Current ratio 0.66 1.14 1.82
Net debt to EBITDA (0.39) (4.08) (0.48)

Dividend

Metric SEAT SFUN Internet Content & Information median
Dividend yield — — 1.07%
Payout ratio — — 0.28

Size

Metric SEAT SFUN Internet Content & Information median
Market cap 33.50m 25.30m 318.52m

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack