Outdoor Holding Company (POWW) vs TAT Technologies Ltd. (TATT)

Outdoor Holding Company and TAT Technologies Ltd. are both Aerospace & Defense companies. TAT Technologies Ltd. is the larger, with a market value of $466.8M against $268.1M — 1.7× the size. TAT Technologies Ltd. trades at the lower P/E: 19.7× against 76.7×. TAT Technologies Ltd. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months: 13.7% against 9.74%. TAT Technologies Ltd. has the higher net margin (12.2% vs 6.42%) and the higher return on invested capital (9.16% vs 1.07%). Across the 21 metrics below, TAT Technologies Ltd. leads on 12 and Outdoor Holding Company on 9.

Valuation

Metric POWW TATT Aerospace & Defense median
P/E 76.67 19.67 28.48
P/S 4.98 2.39 2.95
P/B 1.14 2.38 2.68
Price to free cash flow 28.51 250.83 31.70
EV/EBITDA 11.52 15.20 16.85
EV/Sales 3.88 2.17 2.74
Earnings yield 1.30% 5.08% 0.89%
Free cash flow yield 3.51% 0.40% 0.00%

Profitability

Metric POWW TATT Aerospace & Defense median
Gross margin 86.53% 26.64% 26.41%
Operating margin 5.61% 11.52% 3.69%
Net margin 6.42% 12.17% 2.74%
Free cash flow margin 17.48% 1.33% 0.00%
Return on equity 1.50% 12.99% 4.44%
Return on assets 1.29% 9.97% 1.90%
Return on invested capital 1.07% 9.16% 0.26%

Growth

Metric POWW TATT Aerospace & Defense median
Revenue growth (TTM) 9.74% 13.71% 18.03%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) 95.61% 37.00% 24.80%
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR (3.93%) 18.76% 9.73%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Health

Metric POWW TATT Aerospace & Defense median
Debt to equity 0.04 0.06 0.20
Current ratio 4.74 4.97 2.85
Net debt to EBITDA (6.70) (1.65) 1.29

Dividend

Metric POWW TATT Aerospace & Defense median
Dividend yield — — 0.91%
Payout ratio — — 0.30

Size

Metric POWW TATT Aerospace & Defense median
Market cap 268.10m 466.76m 1.78b

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack