Outdoor Holding Company (POWW) vs TAT Technologies Ltd. (TATT)

Outdoor Holding Company and TAT Technologies Ltd. are both Aerospace & Defense companies. TAT Technologies Ltd. is the larger, with a market value of $418.7M against $249.5M — 1.7× the size. TAT Technologies Ltd. trades at the lower P/E: 20.4× against 72.7×. TAT Technologies Ltd. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months: 12.1% against 9.74%. TAT Technologies Ltd. has the higher net margin (11.3% vs 6.42%) and the higher return on invested capital (8.08% vs 1.07%). Across the 21 metrics below, TAT Technologies Ltd. leads on 12 and Outdoor Holding Company on 9.

Valuation

Metric POWW TATT Aerospace & Defense median
P/E 72.67 20.40 31.81
P/S 4.72 2.28 3.55
P/B 1.08 2.26 2.59
Price to free cash flow 27.03 58.80 31.99
EV/EBITDA 10.75 15.89 18.08
EV/Sales 3.62 2.05 3.37
Earnings yield 1.38% 4.90% 1.38%
Free cash flow yield 3.70% 1.70% 0.21%

Profitability

Metric POWW TATT Aerospace & Defense median
Gross margin 86.53% 24.98% 25.48%
Operating margin 5.61% 10.07% 4.54%
Net margin 6.42% 11.26% 2.22%
Free cash flow margin 17.48% 4.28% 1.43%
Return on equity 1.50% 11.86% 6.43%
Return on assets 1.29% 9.14% 2.70%
Return on invested capital 1.07% 8.08% 1.56%

Growth

Metric POWW TATT Aerospace & Defense median
Revenue growth (TTM) 9.74% 12.06% 18.43%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) 95.61% 37.00% 24.27%
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR (3.93%) 18.76% 9.73%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Health

Metric POWW TATT Aerospace & Defense median
Debt to equity 0.04 0.06 0.24
Current ratio 4.74 4.83 2.72
Net debt to EBITDA (6.70) (1.65) 1.12

Dividend

Metric POWW TATT Aerospace & Defense median
Dividend yield — — 0.90%
Payout ratio — — 0.32

Size

Metric POWW TATT Aerospace & Defense median
Market cap 249.53m 418.67m 2.19b

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack