Omada Health, Inc. (OMDA) vs Schrodinger, Inc. (SDGR)
Omada Health, Inc. and Schrodinger, Inc. are both Health Information Services companies. Schrodinger, Inc. is the larger, with a market value of $2.2B against $1.2B — 1.8× the size. Schrodinger, Inc. has negative trailing earnings, so its P/E is not meaningful; Omada Health, Inc. trades at 281×. Omada Health, Inc. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months: 52.5% against 8.88%. Omada Health, Inc. has the higher net margin (1.39% vs −21.0%) and the lower return on invested capital (−0.93% vs 0.00%). Across the 16 metrics below, Omada Health, Inc. leads on 14 and Schrodinger, Inc. on 2.
Valuation
Profitability
| Metric | OMDA | SDGR | Health Information Services median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 68.19% | 56.87% | 63.38% |
| Operating margin | (0.15%) | (59.24%) | (8.35%) |
| Net margin | 1.39% | (20.98%) | (14.70%) |
| Free cash flow margin | 5.53% | (50.29%) | 0.58% |
| Return on equity | 1.84% | (16.18%) | (6.82%) |
| Return on assets | 1.36% | (8.18%) | (6.02%) |
| Return on invested capital | (0.93%) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Growth
Health
Dividend
Size
Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack