China Liberal Education Holdings Limited (CLEUF) vs KIDZ AI Inc. (KIDZ)

China Liberal Education Holdings Limited and KIDZ AI Inc. are both Education & Training Services companies. China Liberal Education Holdings Limited is the larger, with a market value of $3.5M against $970.0K — 3.6× the size. China Liberal Education Holdings Limited has negative trailing earnings, so its P/E is not meaningful; KIDZ AI Inc. trades at 0.0×. China Liberal Education Holdings Limited grew revenue faster over the last twelve months: 159.2% against −16.7%. China Liberal Education Holdings Limited has the higher net margin (−12.3% vs −338.5%) and the higher return on invested capital (0.00% vs −131.1%). Across the 16 metrics below, China Liberal Education Holdings Limited leads on 12 and KIDZ AI Inc. on 4.

Valuation

Metric CLEUF KIDZ Education & Training Services median
P/E n/m 0.00 12.09
P/S n/m 0.02 0.80
P/B n/m 0.01 1.39
Price to free cash flow n/m n/m 7.31
EV/EBITDA 74.77 2.94 6.36
EV/Sales (3.62) (2.88) 0.58
Earnings yield 0.00% 169,754.11% 3.29%
Free cash flow yield 0.00% (6,936.42%) 3.03%

Profitability

Metric CLEUF KIDZ Education & Training Services median
Gross margin 43.98% 58.82% 55.03%
Operating margin 0.00% (128.81%) 0.00%
Net margin (12.29%) (338.50%) 1.77%
Free cash flow margin 0.00% (167.59%) 0.00%
Return on equity 0.00% (151.18%) 0.00%
Return on assets 0.00% (52.99%) 0.00%
Return on invested capital 0.00% (131.14%) 0.00%

Growth

Metric CLEUF KIDZ Education & Training Services median
Revenue growth (TTM) 159.15% (16.68%) 5.84%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) (48.62%) (561.58%) 14.71%
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR (9.71%) — 4.24%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR 0.00% — 0.00%

Health

Metric CLEUF KIDZ Education & Training Services median
Debt to equity 0.02 0.07 0.05
Current ratio 16.25 3.89 1.37
Net debt to EBITDA 21.74 (1.86) (0.04)

Dividend

Metric CLEUF KIDZ Education & Training Services median
Dividend yield — — 2.64%
Payout ratio — — 0.26

Size

Metric CLEUF KIDZ Education & Training Services median
Market cap 3.47m 970.00k 59.54m

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack