Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) vs China Liberal Education Holdings Limited (CLEUF)

Ambow Education Holding Ltd. and China Liberal Education Holdings Limited are both Education & Training Services companies. Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is the larger, with a market value of $5.6M against $3.5M — 1.6× the size. China Liberal Education Holdings Limited has negative trailing earnings, so its P/E is not meaningful; Ambow Education Holding Ltd. trades at 2.8×. China Liberal Education Holdings Limited grew revenue faster over the last twelve months: 159.2% against −22.5%. Ambow Education Holding Ltd. has the higher net margin (21.1% vs −12.3%) and the higher return on invested capital (10.6% vs 0.00%). Across the 17 metrics below, Ambow Education Holding Ltd. leads on 11 and China Liberal Education Holdings Limited on 6.

Valuation

Metric AMBO CLEUF Education & Training Services median
P/E 2.80 n/m 11.19
P/S 0.59 n/m 0.92
P/B 0.70 n/m 1.63
Price to free cash flow n/m n/m 9.62
EV/EBITDA 2.67 74.77 7.02
EV/Sales 0.20 (3.62) 0.82
Earnings yield 35.76% 0.00% 3.17%
Free cash flow yield (0.38%) 0.00% 2.30%

Profitability

Metric AMBO CLEUF Education & Training Services median
Gross margin 55.75% 43.98% 54.64%
Operating margin 7.60% 0.00% 0.00%
Net margin 21.05% (12.29%) 3.29%
Free cash flow margin 8.33% 0.00% 0.00%
Return on equity 28.21% 0.00% 0.00%
Return on assets 22.53% 0.00% 0.00%
Return on invested capital 10.56% 0.00% 0.00%

Growth

Metric AMBO CLEUF Education & Training Services median
Revenue growth (TTM) (22.51%) 159.15% 6.97%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) 327.27% (103.92%) —
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR (34.99%) (9.71%) 4.27%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Health

Metric AMBO CLEUF Education & Training Services median
Debt to equity 0.37 0.02 0.08
Current ratio 2.44 16.25 1.33
Net debt to EBITDA (25.88) 21.74 (0.15)

Dividend

Metric AMBO CLEUF Education & Training Services median
Dividend yield 1.13% — 1.13%
Payout ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00

Size

Metric AMBO CLEUF Education & Training Services median
Market cap 5.64m 3.47m 68.93m

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack