Pricing Log in Create free account

HeartBeam, Inc. (BEAT) vs Cue Health Inc. (HLTHQ)

HeartBeam, Inc. and Cue Health Inc. are both Health Information Services companies. HeartBeam, Inc. is the larger, with a market value of $22.2M against $6.9M — 3.2× the size. HeartBeam, Inc. has the higher net margin (0.00% vs −526.5%) and the higher return on invested capital (0.00% vs −146.4%). Across the 11 metrics below, HeartBeam, Inc. leads on 7 and Cue Health Inc. on 4.

Valuation

Metric BEAT HLTHQ Health Information Services median
P/E n/m n/m 42.03
P/S n/m n/m 1.80
P/B 2.58 n/m 1.87
Price to free cash flow n/m n/m 16.74
EV/EBITDA n/m 0.24 13.40
EV/Sales n/m (1.15) 2.63
Earnings yield (127.50%) 0.00% (2.73%)
Free cash flow yield (66.37%) 0.00% 0.00%

Profitability

Metric BEAT HLTHQ Health Information Services median
Gross margin — (79.16%) 59.61%
Operating margin 0.00% (556.63%) (10.54%)
Net margin 0.00% (526.48%) (16.14%)
Free cash flow margin 0.00% (222.19%) 0.00%
Return on equity (328.44%) (90.35%) (3.15%)
Return on assets (244.27%) (72.21%) (5.62%)
Return on invested capital 0.00% (146.40%) 0.00%

Growth

Metric BEAT HLTHQ Health Information Services median
Revenue growth (TTM) — (85.33%) 6.48%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) 15.07% (86.26%) 63.46%
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR — — 10.98%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR 0.00% — 0.00%

Health

Metric BEAT HLTHQ Health Information Services median
Debt to equity 0.00 0.00 0.00
Current ratio 3.66 2.54 2.15
Net debt to EBITDA 0.21 0.24 0.71

Dividend

Metric BEAT HLTHQ Health Information Services median
Dividend yield — — —
Payout ratio — — —

Size

Metric BEAT HLTHQ Health Information Services median
Market cap 22.24m 6.90m 309.94m

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack