Uber Technologies, Inc.
UBER Technology Software Application
Uber Technologies, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $52.0 billion, up 18.3% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 12.2%, EPS grew 81.5%, free cash flow grew 12.8% and total debt rose 32.8%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Member of the S&P 500; revenue growth for five consecutive years, operating cash flow growth for five; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) Altman Z-score
Uber Technologies, Inc.'s Altman Z-score for fiscal 2025 is 3.95, in the safe zone (above 2.99).
Altman Z-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Altman Z-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 3.95 | 0.83 |
| FY2024 | 3.12 | 0.29 |
| FY2023 | 2.83 | 2.22 |
| FY2022 | 0.61 | (0.67) |
| FY2021 | 1.28 | (0.35) |
| FY2020 | 1.63 | 1.20 |
| FY2019 | 0.43 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Component | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital / total assets | 0.03 | — | 0.03 | |
| Retained earnings / total assets | (0.17) | — | −0.24 | |
| EBIT / total assets | 0.09 | — | 0.30 | |
| Market value of equity / total liabilities | 5.03 | — | 3.02 | |
| Sales / total assets | 0.84 | — | 0.84 | |
| Altman Z-score | Safe zone | 3.95 | ||
| Z″ Variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies (drops the sales/assets term, uses book equity) | Distress zone | 1.09 | ||
Z and Z″ put Uber Technologies, Inc. in different zones: safe zone by Z, distress zone by Z″.
How the Altman Z-score works
Z = 1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets (Altman, 1968). The market value of equity is the close on the last trading day of the fiscal year times weighted basic shares.
Z″ = 6.56 × working capital ÷ total assets + 3.26 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 6.72 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 1.05 × book equity ÷ total liabilities (Altman, Hartzell and Peck, 1995), the variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies.
| Zone | Z | Z″ |
|---|---|---|
| Safe zone | above 2.99 | above 2.60 |
| Grey zone | 1.81–2.99 | 1.10–2.60 |
| Distress zone | below 1.81 | below 1.10 |
Not worked out for banks, insurers and REITs, whose balance sheets the model does not describe, nor when a figure is missing or there is no share price in the week to the fiscal year end.
Altman Z-score against peers
| Company | Altman Z-score |
|---|---|
| SHOP Shopify Inc. compare | 75.0× |
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. compare | 13.2× |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. compare | 10.9× |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. compare | 8.5× |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. compare | 8.3× |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. compare | 4.1× |
| UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. | 3.9× |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. compare | 3.1× |
| ADP Automatic Data Processing, Inc. compare | 2.2× |
What Altman Z-score is
The Altman Z-Score weighs working capital, retained earnings, operating profit, market value and sales against assets and debts to gauge the risk of distress.
1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets
More on UBER
- Revenue
- Net income
- EPS (diluted)
- EBITDA
- Free cash flow
- Operating cash flow
- Gross margin
- Operating margin
- Net margin
- Free cash flow margin
- P/E ratio
- P/S ratio
- P/B ratio
- Price to free cash flow
- EV/EBITDA
- EV/Sales
- EV/FCF
- Return on equity
- Return on assets
- Return on invested capital
- Debt to equity
- Current ratio
- Total debt
- Shares outstanding
- Book value per share
- Revenue growth
- Piotroski F-score
- Beneish M-score
- The full statement