Sinovac Biotech, Ltd. SVA
- Market cap
- $642.4M
- P/E
- 0.2×
Follow SVA
Target Price Range
Analyst price targets
Free account| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.38 | 4.60 | 5.73 | 0.00 | 6.47 | 6.47 | 6.47 | 6.47 | 6.47 | 6.47 |
Analyst estimates 2026–2028 Powerpack |
Low Price
|
||
| 7.16 | 8.11 | 8.75 | 7.10 | 6.47 | 6.47 | 6.47 | 6.47 | 6.47 | 6.47 |
High Price
|
|||
| 835 | 800 | 870 | 1,043 | 2,212 | 5,505 | 4,275 | 3,261 | 2,643 | 3,008 |
Employees
|
|||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Revenue/Emp
|
|||
| 72 | 174 | 230 | 246 | 511 | 19,375 | 1,493 | 470 | 361 | 386 |
Revenue
|
|||
| 69.08% | 88.39% | 89.23% | 86.80% | 86.84% | 94.47% | 54.15% | 68.77% | 61.07% | 67.87% |
Gross Margin
|
|||
| 0 | 45 | 47 | 71 | 217 | 17,563 | 25 | (84) | 43 | (262) |
EBT
|
|||
| (0.54%) | 25.84% | 20.28% | 28.78% | 42.42% | 90.65% | 1.69% | (17.97%) | 11.85% | (67.90%) |
EBT Margin
|
|||
| (3) | 37 | 36 | 65 | 185 | 14,459 | 88 | (121) | 41 | (199) |
Net Income
|
|||
| 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 85 | 155 | 158 | 111 | 99 |
Depreciation
|
|||
| 1.27 | 3.06 | 3.55 | 2.59 | 5.16 | 195.09 | 15.00 | 6.55 | 5.03 | 5.37 |
Revenue/Sh
|
|||
| (0.01) | 0.45 | 0.34 | 0.42 | 1.06 | 85.20 | 1.08 | (1.06) | 1.27 | (0.83) |
Earnings/Sh
|
|||
| (0.27) | 1.05 | 0.12 | 0.41 | 4.85 | 154.59 | (7.75) | 1.93 | (0.79) | (7.13) |
Cash Flow/Sh
|
|||
| (0.22) | (0.21) | (0.09) | (0.11) | (1.29) | (7.25) | (4.05) | (2.17) | (1.36) | (0.68) |
Capex/Sh
|
|||
| (0.49) | 0.84 | 0.04 | 0.30 | 3.56 | 147.34 | (11.79) | (0.24) | (2.15) | (7.81) |
Free CF/Sh
|
|||
| 2.28 | 3.11 | 4.51 | 3.71 | 11.33 | 139.72 | 127.76 | 162.08 | 143.24 | 89.01 |
Book Value/Sh
|
|||
| 57 | 57 | 65 | 95 | 99 | 99 | 100 | 72 | 72 | 72 |
Shares
|
|||
| 0.00 | 13.59 | 12.44 | 16.18 | 6.05 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 |
PE Ratio
|
|||
| 4.64 | 1.95 | 1.96 | 2.49 | 1.25 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
PS Ratio
|
|||
| 2.59 | 3.03 | 1.54 | 1.74 | 0.57 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.10 |
PB Ratio
|
|||
| 4.30 | 1.63 | 1.25 | 1.69 | (0.99) | (0.64) | (0.51) | (1.02) | (0.96) | (0.88) |
EV/Sales
|
|||
| (11.08) | 8.03 | 121.62 | 14.58 | (1.43) | (0.83) | (0.76) | (2.17) | 4.82 | 8.09 |
EV/FCF
|
|||
| (15) | 60 | 8 | 39 | 479 | 15,353 | (771) | 139 | (57) | (512) |
Op' Cash Flow
|
|||
| (13) | (12) | (6) | (11) | (128) | (720) | (403) | (156) | (97) | (49) |
Capex
|
|||
| (28) | 48 | 2 | 28 | 352 | 14,633 | (1,174) | (18) | (154) | (561) |
FCF
|
|||
| 64 | 111 | 226 | 262 | 881 | 12,502 | 11,035 | 10,305 | 9,193 | 5,524 |
Working Cap'
|
|||
| 41 | 40 | 14 | 7 | 41 | 20 | 12 | 254 | 376 | 495 |
Total Debt
|
|||
| (25) | (76) | (163) | (199) | (1,144) | (13,406) | (11,309) | (10,770) | (9,840) | (6,145) |
Net Debt
|
|||
| 130 | 177 | 292 | 352 | 1,120 | 13,876 | 12,713 | 11,642 | 10,293 | 6,396 |
Sh' Equity
|
|||
| (0.29%) | 10.11% | 6.51% | 9.68% | 8.87% | 90.74% | 0.70% | (0.10%) | 0.70% | (0.57%) |
ROA
|
|||
| 0.30% | 28.04% | 22.00% | 27.93% | 0.00% | 2,332.85% | (20.75%) | (51.13%) | (69.65%) | (121.75%) |
ROIC
|
|||
| (0.45%) | 16.82% | 9.29% | 12.36% | 14.18% | 112.85% | 0.81% | (0.11%) | 0.83% | (0.72%) |
ROE
|
|||
Sinovac Biotech, Ltd. peers in the Other sector
| Company | Market cap | P/E | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| JONE Jones Energy, Inc. | $281.9M | 0.0× | Compare |
Sinovac Biotech, Ltd. (SVA) key facts
- Sinovac Biotech, Ltd. (SVA) is an Other company in the Other sector, listed on Nasdaq.
- Sinovac Biotech, Ltd.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $386.0 million, up 6.82% from fiscal 2024.
- As of July 7, 2026, SVA traded at $6.47, a market capitalization of $642.4 million.
- Return on equity was −0.72% and debt-to-equity 0.06.
Sinovac Biotech, Ltd. (SVA) Latest News
17 Aug
Sinovac Biotech reports unaudited financial results for the first half of 2026. Half-year financial results provide performance metrics that can shift market views on operations and valuation.
15 Jun
Sinovac Biotech regained compliance with the Nasdaq Global Market’s listing requirements. Regaining Nasdaq compliance avoids delisting risk and sustains trading access plus investor confidence.
29 May
Sinovac Biotech Ltd. received a Nasdaq notification for late filing of its 2025 annual report. Late filing notice raises delisting risk and damages investor confidence in Sinovac.
8 May
Sinovac Biotech, Ltd. (SVA) reported unaudited financial results for the first half of 2025. Unaudited half-year financial results affect assessments of financial performance and investor sentiment.
6 Feb
The Coxsackievirus Infections Market Research Report (2025-2035) highlights the significant burden of pediatric and neonatal infections linked to increased risks of type 1 diabetes. Advances in vaccine development are expected to drive market expansion, addressing the urgent need for effective prevention strategies against these infections. Advancements in vaccine development could moderately influence Sinovac's competitive positioning and market performance.
22 Jan
Sinovac Biotech, Ltd. announced that the Nasdaq Hearings Panel has granted its request for continued listing on the exchange. The decision follows the company's compliance with Nasdaq's requirements, allowing it to maintain its listing status despite previous concerns regarding its financial reporting. This development is seen as a positive step for Sinovac, potentially stabilizing investor confidence and market performance. Maintaining Nasdaq listing is expected to positively influence investor sentiment and operational stability.
4 Jan
Sinovac Biotech, Ltd. provided an update regarding a High Court order in Antigua and the engagement of an auditor. The company is addressing legal matters that may impact its operations and financial reporting. The update is part of ongoing efforts to ensure compliance and transparency in its business practices. Legal and compliance issues can moderately influence the company's operational stability and market perception.
17 Dec
An Antigua court has issued an interim order granting control of Sinovac Biotech, Ltd. to its board until the trial concerning the disputed 2025 shareholder meeting. This decision comes amid ongoing disputes regarding the company's governance and shareholder rights. The court's decision to grant board control could significantly impact Sinovac's governance and strategic direction, influencing investor sentiment and market performance.
18 Nov
Sinovac Biotech, Ltd. has received a notice from Nasdaq regarding its potential delisting due to failing to meet the minimum bid price requirement. The company intends to appeal this decision, which could impact its listing status and market operations. Sinovac is currently evaluating its options and plans to respond to the notice within the stipulated timeframe. The Nasdaq delisting notice and the company's intention to appeal could significantly affect investor sentiment and market performance.
11 Nov
Independent shareholders of Sinovac Biotech, Ltd. have expressed strong support for an immediate dividend payment, emphasizing the need for the company to reward its investors. This call for dividends comes amid ongoing discussions about the company's financial strategies and shareholder value. The shareholders believe that a timely dividend would enhance investor confidence and reflect positively on the company's performance. Shareholder support for dividends may influence market sentiment and financial performance but is not expected to fundamentally alter the company's trajectory.
24 Oct
Sinovac Biotech, Ltd. has announced the appointment of an independent auditor, a move aimed at enhancing its financial transparency and governance. This decision reflects the company's commitment to maintaining high standards of accountability and compliance with regulatory requirements. The new auditor is expected to provide an objective assessment of the company's financial statements and operations, which may bolster investor confidence and support future growth initiatives. Appointment of an independent auditor may improve financial transparency and investor confidence, but its overall impact on the company's trajectory is expected to be limited.
11 Jul
SINOVAC Biotech Ltd. announced the valid adjournment of its Special Meeting of Shareholders due to ongoing litigation regarding the validity of PIPE shares. The current Board, led by Chairman Chiang Li, remains the only valid governing body, dismissing claims from SAIF and the Dissenting Investor Group as illegal and deceptive. The Board will reconvene the Special Meeting once the court resolves the issue. Meanwhile, the company continues its operations, including dividend distributions and plans for future listings. Shareholders are urged to rely on official communications from the Board. The ongoing legal proceedings and the Board's actions could significantly impact governance and shareholder confidence.
10 Jul
Sinovac Biotech, Ltd. has elected new directors who convened for their first board meeting. The meeting focused on strategic planning and future initiatives aimed at enhancing the company's operations and market position. Discussions included potential collaborations and product development strategies to strengthen Sinovac's competitive edge in the biotechnology sector. The new board's strategic planning and initiatives may moderately influence Sinovac's operational effectiveness and market positioning.
9 Jul
Sinovac Biotech, Ltd. (SVA) has issued a strong denunciation against SAIF and a former board member for making deceptive and illegal claims regarding the company. The board asserts that these actions are unfounded and detrimental to the company's reputation and operations. Sinovac emphasizes its commitment to transparency and integrity in its business practices, urging stakeholders to disregard the misleading statements. The deceptive claims could significantly impact Sinovac's reputation and investor sentiment, potentially altering its market position.
Sinovac Biotech shareholders voted to remove the current directors and elect nominees from SAIF Partners at a Special Meeting. The meeting was initially adjourned by incumbent Chairman Chiang Li without shareholder participation, but a continuation was held by remaining director Yuk Lam Lo. The newly elected directors are committed to supporting dividend payouts and resuming trading of Sinovac's common shares to unlock long-term value for shareholders. The removal of incumbent directors and the election of new ones by SAIF Partners is a significant strategic shift that could alter the company's trajectory and investor sentiment.
The Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court granted Vivo Capital and Prime Success the right to participate in a critical shareholder vote for Sinovac Biotech, staying an injunction sought by 1Globe that aimed to disenfranchise legitimate shareholders. The court's decision allows these long-term shareholders to attend and vote, countering 1Globe's alleged unscrupulous actions to gain control of the company without contributing to its success. Vivo has been a significant investor in Sinovac since 2018, supporting its governance and financial recovery. The court's ruling significantly impacts shareholder rights and governance, potentially altering investor sentiment and the company's future trajectory.
SINOVAC Biotech Ltd. announced that a special cash dividend of US$55.00 per common share is being paid to valid shareholders who owned shares as of July 7, 2025. Dividend checks for record holders will be sent via FedEx or UPS on July 9, 2025, while payments for larger amounts will be wired. Shareholders with shares held through brokers must ensure their brokers submit a 'broker letter' to facilitate payment. The company continues to prioritize dividend distributions according to its policy. The special cash dividend may positively influence shareholder sentiment and financial performance but is not expected to fundamentally alter the company's trajectory.
Sinovac Biotech, Ltd. has announced the adjournment of its special meeting of shareholders until a court can make a final decision regarding the validity of the PIPE shares. This decision comes amid ongoing legal considerations that could impact the company's shareholder structure and future financing. The adjournment of the meeting indicates potential legal challenges that may affect shareholder confidence and operational decisions.
7 Jul
The U.S. District Court for Massachusetts denied Vivo Capital's petition regarding SINOVAC Biotech's shareholder votes and corporate governance, allowing the distribution of a US$55.00 special cash dividend. This ruling marks the fourth failed legal attempt by Vivo Capital and Advantech/Prime to block dividend payments and regain control of SINOVAC. Independent proxy advisory firms recommend shareholders keep the current Board, led by Dr. Chiang Li, who has successfully defended against the Dissenting Investor Group's actions. The current Board aims to protect shareholder rights and deliver value, urging shareholders to vote against proposals to remove them. The court ruling supports the current Board's ability to distribute dividends, significantly impacting shareholder value and corporate governance.
Sinovac Biotech, Ltd. urges shareholders to vote against proposals 1 and 2 using the WHITE proxy card, emphasizing that these proposals are misguided and could negatively impact the company's direction. The company is focused on maintaining its strategic objectives and ensuring shareholder interests are prioritized during the voting process. Voting outcomes on these proposals could moderately influence Sinovac's strategic direction and shareholder sentiment.
3 Jul
Leading independent proxy advisory firm ISS has joined Glass Lewis in recommending that shareholders of Sinovac Biotech, Ltd. (SVA) vote to retain the current board of directors. This endorsement comes amid ongoing discussions regarding the company's governance and strategic direction, highlighting the importance of board stability for investor confidence. The backing from prominent proxy advisory firms is likely to significantly influence shareholder decisions and stabilize the company's governance structure.
2 Jul
The U.S. District Court of Massachusetts has barred 1Globe Capital and Jiaqiang Li from making misleading statements about their shareholding in Sinovac Biotech, mandating updated disclosures within five days. The court found that 1Globe likely violated federal securities laws and engaged in deceptive practices to mislead shareholders. Vivo Capital, a long-term shareholder, is urging support for its slate of nominees to restore transparent governance at Sinovac ahead of a special shareholder meeting on July 9, 2025. The ruling aims to counteract 1Globe's attempts to weaken corporate governance and disenfranchise shareholders. The court ruling and subsequent governance changes could significantly impact Sinovac's corporate structure and investor sentiment.
SAIF Partners, the largest investor in Sinovac Biotech Ltd., is urging shareholders to vote for its director candidates in the upcoming Special Meeting on July 8, 2025. The firm claims the current Board lacks integrity and the capability to address critical issues, including ongoing lawsuits and the suspension of trading of Sinovac's shares. SAIF Partners believes that electing its nominees will restore credibility and unlock long-term value for shareholders. Shareholders are encouraged to vote using the GOLD proxy card to support the proposed changes. The potential board change could significantly impact Sinovac's governance and financial strategy, influencing investor sentiment and company performance.
Glass Lewis, a leading independent proxy advisory firm, has recommended that shareholders of Sinovac Biotech, Ltd. vote to retain the current board of directors. This endorsement comes amid ongoing discussions regarding the company's governance and strategic direction, emphasizing the importance of stability in leadership during critical times. The recommendation to keep the current board may influence shareholder sentiment and governance stability, but its overall impact on the company's trajectory is expected to be limited.
1 Jul
SAIF Partners, the largest investor in Sinovac Biotech Ltd., has sent a letter to shareholders criticizing the current Board for failing to deliver value and making empty promises regarding dividends. The Board's recent announcement of increased dividends is seen as a desperate attempt to retain control ahead of the Special Meeting on July 8, 2025. SAIF Partners accuses the Board of recklessness and unethical behavior, citing past legal issues involving certain directors. They have nominated ten new director candidates to restore credibility and maximize shareholder value, urging shareholders to vote for their nominees using the GOLD Proxy Card. The potential change in leadership and governance could significantly impact Sinovac's financial performance and shareholder value.
27 Jun
SINOVAC Biotech Ltd. has successfully defended against a lawsuit from Advantech/Prime in Hong Kong, allowing the company to proceed with a US$55.00 per common share special cash dividend scheduled for July 7, 2025. The Hong Kong court denied Advantech/Prime's petition for interim relief, criticizing their lack of full disclosure and self-induced urgency. The court also ordered Advantech/Prime to cover legal costs incurred by SINOVAC and its partners. The current SINOVAC Board emphasizes its commitment to protecting shareholder rights and urges shareholders to vote against proposals to remove the board or appoint a former board slate. The court ruling allows SINOVAC to proceed with a significant dividend payment, impacting investor sentiment and the company's financial stability.
25 Jun
Sinovac Biotech, Ltd. is facing scrutiny over its corporate governance practices, which have been criticized for lack of transparency and accountability. Investors are concerned about the company's management decisions and their impact on financial performance. The article highlights the need for improved governance structures to restore investor confidence and enhance operational efficiency. Without significant changes, the company's future growth and market position may be jeopardized. Significant governance issues could lead to major strategic shifts and affect investor sentiment.
24 Jun
SAIF Partners, the largest shareholder of Sinovac Biotech Ltd., has sent an open letter to fellow shareholders criticizing the current board for failing to act in their interests, particularly regarding dividend payments and resuming trading of shares. The letter urges shareholders to vote for SAIF's nominated candidates in the upcoming special meeting, emphasizing the board's lack of legitimacy and engagement. SAIF Partners claims that the current board has prioritized legal disputes over shareholder value and has not taken necessary actions to distribute dividends or resume trading, despite the company holding approximately $10.3 billion in cash. The potential for significant changes in board leadership and corporate governance could greatly impact Sinovac's financial performance and shareholder value.
SINOVAC Biotech Ltd. has filed an investor presentation with the SEC and launched a website to inform shareholders about the upcoming Special Meeting on July 9, 2025. The current Board of Directors urges shareholders to vote against proposals to remove them and appoint a former board slate, highlighting their commitment to restoring fairness and delivering value, including plans for significant dividends and compliance with NASDAQ standards. The Board counters claims from a dissenting investor group, which has a history of misleading actions. Shareholders are encouraged to vote using the WHITE proxy card to support the current Board. The Board's actions and upcoming shareholder vote could significantly influence SINOVAC's governance and financial strategy.
21 Jun
Prime Success L.P., a significant shareholder of Sinovac Biotech Ltd. (SVA), issued a statement following a New York court ruling affirming its rights to vote at an upcoming special meeting. The court denied the 1Globe Activist Board's attempt to prevent Prime Success from voting its shares. Prime Success criticized the 1Globe Board for misleading shareholders and emphasized its support for dividend distribution and the need for a refreshed board to enhance governance and resume NASDAQ trading. The article highlights ongoing legal disputes and the importance of shareholder votes in determining Sinovac's future leadership. The court ruling and shareholder dynamics could significantly influence Sinovac's governance and operational direction.