Sanmina Corporation
SANM Technology Electronic Components
Sanmina Corporation’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended September 2025) was $8.1 billion, up 7.40% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 69.7%, EPS grew 69.5%, free cash flow fell 85.6% and total debt rose 613.0%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Operating cash flow growth for three consecutive years; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow SANM
Sanmina Corporation (SANM) Piotroski F-score
Sanmina Corporation's Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 7 out of 9: 7 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, unchanged from fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 7 | 0.00 |
| FY2024 | 7 | (1.00) |
| FY2023 | 8 | 1.00 |
| FY2022 | 7 | 0.00 |
| FY2021 | 7 | 0.00 |
| FY2020 | 7 | (1.00) |
| FY2019 | 8 | 4.00 |
| FY2018 | 4 | (2.00) |
| FY2017 | 6 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | 4.60% | 4.59% | Pass | 1 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 620.66m | 340.22m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | 4.60% | 4.59% | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | 374.76m | 117.68m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.05 | 0.06 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 1.72 | 1.99 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 53,947,000 | 55,592,000 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising gross margin | 8.81% | 8.46% | Pass | 1 |
| Rising asset turnover | 1.52 | 1.56 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Strong — most fundamentals improved | 7 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| PLXS Plexus Corp. compare | 8 |
| VICR Vicor Corporation compare | 8 |
| JBL Jabil, Inc. compare | 7 |
| TTMI TTM Technologies, Inc. compare | 7 |
| SANM Sanmina Corporation | 7 |
| LFUS Littelfuse, Inc. compare | 6 |
| FN Fabrinet compare | 6 |
| OLED Universal Display Corporation compare | 6 |
| RAL Ralliant Corporation compare | — |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover