Hayward Holdings, Inc.
HAYW Industrials Electrical Equipment & Parts
Hayward Holdings, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $1.1 billion, up 6.71% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 6.27%, EPS was flat, free cash flow grew 66.9% and total debt was flat, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Operating cash flow growth for three consecutive years; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow HAYW
Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) Altman Z-score
Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s Altman Z-score for fiscal 2025 is 2.51, in the grey zone (1.81–2.99).
Altman Z-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Altman Z-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 2.51 | 0.16 |
| FY2024 | 2.35 | 0.28 |
| FY2023 | 2.07 | 0.13 |
| FY2022 | 1.94 | (1.05) |
| FY2021 | 2.99 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Component | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working capital / total assets | 0.20 | — | 0.24 | |
| Retained earnings / total assets | 0.27 | — | 0.38 | |
| EBIT / total assets | 0.07 | — | 0.24 | |
| Market value of equity / total liabilities | 2.15 | — | 1.29 | |
| Sales / total assets | 0.36 | — | 0.36 | |
| Altman Z-score | Grey zone | 2.51 | ||
| Z″ Variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies (drops the sales/assets term, uses book equity) | Safe zone | 3.76 | ||
Z and Z″ put Hayward Holdings, Inc. in different zones: grey zone by Z, safe zone by Z″.
How the Altman Z-score works
Z = 1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets (Altman, 1968). The market value of equity is the close on the last trading day of the fiscal year times weighted basic shares.
Z″ = 6.56 × working capital ÷ total assets + 3.26 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 6.72 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 1.05 × book equity ÷ total liabilities (Altman, Hartzell and Peck, 1995), the variant for non-manufacturing and asset-light companies.
| Zone | Z | Z″ |
|---|---|---|
| Safe zone | above 2.99 | above 2.60 |
| Grey zone | 1.81–2.99 | 1.10–2.60 |
| Distress zone | below 1.81 | below 1.10 |
Not worked out for banks, insurers and REITs, whose balance sheets the model does not describe, nor when a figure is missing or there is no share price in the week to the fiscal year end.
Altman Z-score against peers
| Company | Altman Z-score |
|---|---|
| AMPX Amprius Technologies, Inc. compare | 9.5× |
| POWL Powell Industries, Inc. compare | 7.7× |
| PLPC Preformed Line Products Company compare | 6.4× |
| ENS Enersys compare | 4.5× |
| ATKR Atkore Inc. compare | 2.8× |
| HAYW Hayward Holdings, Inc. | 2.5× |
| ENR Energizer Holdings, Inc. compare | 1.5× |
| FCEL FuelCell Energy, Inc. compare | −2.2× |
| PLUG Plug Power, Inc. compare | −4.8× |
What Altman Z-score is
The Altman Z-Score weighs working capital, retained earnings, operating profit, market value and sales against assets and debts to gauge the risk of distress.
1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets + 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets + 0.6 × market value of equity ÷ total liabilities + 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets