Globalstar, Inc.
GSAT Communication Services Telecom Services
Globalstar, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $273.0 million, up 9.04% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue fell 3.54%, EPS fell 276.9%, free cash flow fell 20.5% and total debt fell 27.0%, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Revenue growth for three consecutive years, operating cash flow growth for three; insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow GSAT
Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) Piotroski F-score
Globalstar, Inc.'s Piotroski F-score for fiscal 2025 is 4 out of 9: 4 of nine tests of profitability, leverage and efficiency passed, unchanged from fiscal 2024.
Piotroski F-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Piotroski F-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 4 | 0.00 |
| FY2024 | 4 | (2.00) |
| FY2023 | 6 | 2.00 |
| FY2022 | 4 | (1.00) |
| FY2021 | 5 | 0.00 |
| FY2020 | 5 | 0.00 |
| FY2019 | 5 | (1.00) |
| FY2018 | 6 | (1.00) |
| FY2017 | 7 | 2.00 |
| FY2016 | 5 | — |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Test | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive return on assets | (0.95%) | (5.60%) | Fail | 0 |
| Positive operating cash flow | 621.65m | 439.19m | Pass | 1 |
| Rising return on assets | (0.95%) | (5.60%) | Pass | 1 |
| Cash flow above net income | 640.91m | 512.99m | Pass | 1 |
| Falling long-term leverage | 0.22 | 0.36 | Pass | 1 |
| Rising current ratio | 2.42 | 3.16 | Fail | 0 |
| No new shares issued | 126,757,000 | 125,877,000 | Fail | 0 |
| Rising gross margin | 64.80% | 66.94% | Fail | 0 |
| Rising asset turnover | 0.14 | 0.19 | Fail | 0 |
| Piotroski F-score | Mixed | 4 | ||
How the Piotroski F-score works
One point for each of nine tests, this fiscal year against the one before: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, a rising current ratio, no new shares issued, a rising gross margin and rising asset turnover. The ratios are the ones on this site, so each can be checked.
Joseph Piotroski (2000) called 8–9 high and 0–1 low; reading it in three bands is the common convention:
| 7–9 | Strong — most fundamentals improved |
|---|---|
| 4–6 | Mixed |
| 0–3 | Weak — most fundamentals deteriorated |
Where this differs from the paper: return on assets is on average rather than beginning-of-year assets, and weighted basic shares stand in for shares issued. The score is shown only when all nine tests can be worked out, which takes three fiscal years; banks and insurers, which report no current assets or gross profit, have none.
Piotroski F-score against peers
| Company | Piotroski F-score |
|---|---|
| KT KT Corporation compare | 8 |
| TIMB TIM S.A. Sponsored ADR compare | 7 |
| TIGO Millicom International Cellular SA compare | 7 |
| VIV Telefonica Brasil S.A. compare | 7 |
| SKM SK Telecom Co., Ltd. compare | 6 |
| CHTR Charter Communications, Inc. compare | 6 |
| TLK PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia, Tbk compare | 5 |
| LBTYB Liberty Global Ltd compare | 5 |
| GSAT Globalstar, Inc. | 4 |
What Piotroski F-score is
The Piotroski F-Score tells an investor how many signs of improving profitability, funding and efficiency a company shows against a year earlier.
One point for each of nine tests against a year earlier: positive return on assets, positive operating cash flow, rising return on assets, cash flow above net income, falling long-term leverage, rising current ratio, no new shares issued, rising gross margin, and rising asset turnover