Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.

CQP Energy Oil & Gas Midstream

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $10.8 billion, up 23.6% from fiscal 2024.

Revenue
+7.07%
EPS
+65.0%
Free cash flow
+16.7%
Total debt
−2.48%

Quarter to September 2026, against a year earlier

57.40 0.17 +0.30%
Market cap
$27.7B
P/E
9.2×
Fwd P/E
14.7×
Dividend yield
4.05%
F-score
8/9
Altman Z
n/a
Beneish M
−1.49
Dividend safety
21/100

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) Business Profile

Updated · Covers results through FY2025 · How this is made

What it does

Cheniere Energy Partners is a publicly traded limited partnership that produces and exports liquefied natural gas, or LNG. It sells LNG to integrated energy companies, utilities and energy traders around the world. Its principal executive offices are in Houston, Texas.

LNG is natural gas cooled into liquid form for shipment. After reaching its destination, it can be converted back into gas and transported through pipelines for uses such as heating, cooking and industrial activity.

The partnership owns the Sabine Pass LNG Terminal in Cameron Parish, Louisiana. The terminal turns natural gas into LNG, stores it and loads it onto ships. As of December 31, 2025, its production capacity was over 30 mtpa of LNG. The site also has storage tanks, marine berths and equipment that can convert LNG back into gas.

Cheniere Energy Partners also owns and operates the Creole Trail Pipeline through a subsidiary. The pipeline connects the terminal to other gas pipelines that supply its feedstock. Substantially all of the partnership’s assets are held by subsidiaries, through which it conducts most of its business.

The partnership has no employees of its own. Its general partner manages the business and relies on Cheniere subsidiaries to provide personnel under services agreements.

How it makes money

The partnership earns revenue principally by selling LNG under long-term sale and purchase agreements, or SPAs. These agreements generally have a fixed fee for contracted volumes and a variable fee linked to the Henry Hub natural gas benchmark. Customers can cancel or suspend some cargo deliveries under their contracts, but generally must still pay the fixed fee on the affected contracted volumes.

The variable fee is generally intended to cover the gas, transportation and fuel used to produce the LNG. The partnership generally sells LNG under these agreements on a free-on-board basis: customers take delivery at the terminal. Some fixed fees are subject to annual inflation adjustments.

The partnership also uses integrated production marketing, or IPM, agreements. Under these arrangements, a producer sells it natural gas at a price linked to a global LNG or gas index, less a fixed liquefaction fee, shipping and other costs. An IPM agreement paired with an associated LNG sales agreement can generate a take-or-pay-style fixed liquefaction fee.

As of December 31, 2025, SPAs and IPM agreements in effect had approximately 13 years of weighted average remaining life. Together they covered approximately 85% of anticipated production from the liquefaction project through the mid-2030s. LNG not committed under long-term contracts is available to Cheniere Marketing under an SPA.

The terminal also earns fees from reserved regasification capacity. TotalEnergies is required to pay fixed monthly fees under its terminal use agreement whether or not it uses that capacity. The timing of maintenance and the availability of LNG volumes can affect how evenly operating profit is generated during the year.

Customers and how it sells

The partnership supplies LNG to integrated energy companies, utilities and energy trading companies around the world. Its production and export facilities are in Louisiana, while its cargoes are shipped internationally. Customers generally take delivery of LNG at the terminal under their long-term agreements. Cheniere Marketing, an affiliate, also takes LNG under an SPA and has access to production not contracted under other long-term agreements.

Five named customers each accounted for at least 10% of revenue from contracts with external customers in 2025. BG Gulf Coast LNG and affiliates accounted for 22%; Korea Gas Corporation and GAIL (India) Limited each accounted for 15%; Naturgy LNG GOM accounted for 14%; and TotalEnergies Gas & Power North America accounted for 10%. Each contributed to LNG revenue through an SPA.

The terminal’s existing liquefaction project has authorization to export domestically produced LNG to both free-trade-agreement and non-free-trade-agreement countries. Customers receiving LNG can have it converted back into natural gas for transport through local pipelines. TotalEnergies also reserves regasification capacity at Sabine Pass under a separate terminal use agreement.

Suppliers and costs

Natural gas is the feedstock for LNG production. The partnership procures most of it from the U.S. and has secured a portion of its expected needs under long-term supply agreements, including an IPM agreement. It also contracts for pipeline transportation and storage capacity from third parties and its Creole Trail Pipeline subsidiary.

Natural gas feedstock is a cost. The cost of purchasing gas rose in 2025 as U.S. natural gas prices increased, while higher Henry Hub pricing also increased revenue. SPA variable fees are generally designed to cover gas purchases, transportation and liquefaction fuel, limiting exposure to U.S. gas price changes under those contracts.

Other costs include operating and maintaining the terminal and pipeline, as well as payments for services provided by Cheniere subsidiaries. Planned maintenance reduced production volume in 2025 and contributed to higher operating and maintenance expense. The partnership also incurs costs to comply with safety and environmental requirements, and its financing arrangements give rise to interest expense.

From revenue to operating income, FY2025
  1. Revenue$10.8B
  2. Cost of revenue−$6.3B
  3. Selling, general and administrative−$105.0M
  4. Other operating costs−$693.0M
  5. Operating income$3.7B

Competitive position

Cheniere Energy Partners competes with natural gas liquefaction projects around the world when it seeks new LNG contracts or replaces or amends existing agreements. Competition is primarily on price per contracted volume, but also involves production reliability, commercial terms and the ability to tailor arrangements for buyers. Incremental production, including volumes made available to Cheniere Marketing, is exposed to market-based price competition.

One named competitor is Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC, an affiliate. The two compete for LNG sales against other liquefaction projects globally, primarily on price.

Our reading: The existing terminal, pipeline connections and supporting infrastructure provide a meaningful operating foothold because the partnership can produce and ship LNG from an established site. Our reading: Long-term contracts provide another source of durability, given their remaining life and fixed-fee provisions, but they do not eliminate competition when contracts need to be renewed or new capacity is marketed. Our reading: Contract pricing that generally passes through the cost of U.S. gas also supports the model, although it does not remove exposure to the market price competition affecting incremental volumes.

Competitor Where they compete Threat (our reading)
Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC Global LNG sales and long-term liquefaction contracts Medium

Growth opportunities

The partnership has increased available liquefaction capacity through debottlenecking and other optimization projects. It also holds land at Sabine Pass that can accommodate further expansion and is developing a two-phased project adjacent to its existing liquefaction facilities.

The proposed SPL Expansion Project includes three liquefaction trains and supporting infrastructure. The company expects total peak production capacity of up to approximately 20 mtpa of LNG, including estimated debottlenecking opportunities. It is seeking commercial agreements to support the additional capacity and aims to contract approximately 90% of its current and planned liquefaction capacity under long-term SPAs and IPM agreements.

As of the filing, a positive final investment decision required regulatory approvals and acceptable commercial and financing arrangements. The target for a phased investment decision was 2026/2027. The project had received authorization to export to free-trade-agreement countries, while non-free-trade-agreement export approval and several Federal Energy Regulatory Commission milestones remained pending.

It was reported on 23 October 2026 that the partnership had signed a turnkey engineering, procurement and construction agreement with Bechtel Energy in May 2026 and issued a limited notice to proceed for early engineering and procurement.

The company expects global demand for natural gas and LNG to increase. Its ability to secure new contracts for expansion depends on market conditions, while financing depends on factors including interest rates and access to capital.

Revenue by fiscal year
  1. $9.4BFY2021
  2. $17.2BFY2022
  3. $9.7BFY2023
  4. $8.7BFY2024
  5. $10.8BFY2025

Structural risks

  • Customer performance: Failure by a significant customer to perform under a long-term contract could adversely affect operating results, cash flows or liquidity. Several customers each account for a substantial share of external revenue.
  • Supply and operations: Disruptions to third-party gas supply, insufficient gas deliveries, catastrophic weather, operating hazards or cyberattacks could affect terminal operations and the ability to meet LNG delivery obligations.
  • Construction and financing: Expansion can face cost overruns, delays and difficulties obtaining financing. An inability to source capital could also leave the partnership with inadequate liquidity.
  • Market competition: Changes in LNG and natural gas demand or prices, competition based on international LNG prices and the possibility that exported LNG fails to remain competitive in international markets could affect the business.
  • Regulation: The terminal and pipeline require approvals and permits. Failure to obtain or maintain them, or changes in safety and environmental requirements, could affect operations and costs.
  • Partnership structure: The business depends on Cheniere for personnel. Conflicts involving the general partner and its affiliates, limited fiduciary duties and unitholders’ limited voting rights are also risks.

Bottom line

Our reading

Our reading: Cheniere Energy Partners is an LNG infrastructure business whose cash generation rests heavily on long-term contracts and the operation of its Sabine Pass facilities. Those contracts provide fixed-fee protection, but customer performance, gas supply and uninterrupted operations remain important exposures. Expansion could add capacity, while requiring commercial commitments, approvals and financing.