Pricing Log in Create free account

Beneficient (BENF) vs CaliberCos Inc. (CWD)

Beneficient and CaliberCos Inc. are both Asset Management companies. Beneficient is the larger, with a market value of $13.2M against $4.3M — 3.1× the size. Beneficient grew revenue faster over the last twelve months: 53.2% against −49.7%. Beneficient has the higher net margin (63.2% vs −117.3%) and the higher return on invested capital (0.00% vs 0.00%). Across the 12 metrics below, Beneficient leads on 9 and CaliberCos Inc. on 3.

Valuation

Metric BENF CWD Asset Management median
P/E n/m n/m 13.35
P/S n/m 0.22 3.01
P/B n/m 0.10 0.91
Price to free cash flow n/m n/m 7.27
EV/EBITDA — — —
EV/Sales — — —
Earnings yield (5,217.60%) (924.39%) 4.59%
Free cash flow yield (2,364.83%) (399.69%) 4.88%

Profitability

Metric BENF CWD Asset Management median
Gross margin 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
Operating margin 378.64% (61.74%) 28.39%
Net margin 63.17% (117.34%) 11.89%
Free cash flow margin 223.10% (88.90%) 5.96%
Return on equity 5.95% (222.83%) 4.61%
Return on assets (3.09%) (16.10%) 1.45%
Return on invested capital 0.00% 0.00% 2.27%

Growth

Metric BENF CWD Asset Management median
Revenue growth (TTM) 53.17% (49.72%) 7.26%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) (120.59%) 57.22% (5.64%)
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR — (11.91%) 11.84%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Health

Metric BENF CWD Asset Management median
Debt to equity (0.53) 0.00 0.39
Current ratio 3.85 0.77 1.25
Net debt to EBITDA 0.71 8.04 1.06

Dividend

Metric BENF CWD Asset Management median
Dividend yield — — 6.43%
Payout ratio — — 0.92

Size

Metric BENF CWD Asset Management median
Market cap 13.16m 4.28m 677.66m

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack