Amesite Inc. (AMST) vs Triller Group Inc. (ILLR)

Amesite Inc. and Triller Group Inc. are both Software Application companies. Amesite Inc. and Triller Group Inc. are of similar size ($7.1M and $6.6M). Amesite Inc. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months: 313.4% against 145.2%. Amesite Inc. has the higher net margin (−871.7% vs −9,557.8%) and the lower return on invested capital (−278.6% vs 0.00%). Across the 16 metrics below, Triller Group Inc. leads on 9 and Amesite Inc. on 7.

Valuation

Metric AMST ILLR Software Application median
P/E n/m n/m 24.79
P/S 14.06 4.46 2.67
P/B 3.69 n/m 3.01
Price to free cash flow n/m n/m 16.59
EV/EBITDA n/m 4.59 14.40
EV/Sales 12.18 (2.92) 2.62
Earnings yield (60.58%) (2,195.11%) 0.00%
Free cash flow yield (46.20%) (125.01%) 1.91%

Profitability

Metric AMST ILLR Software Application median
Gross margin 100.00% (784.12%) 67.03%
Operating margin (863.60%) 0.00% 0.00%
Net margin (871.71%) (9,557.78%) 0.00%
Free cash flow margin (649.55%) (557.53%) 4.32%
Return on equity (121.49%) 45.71% 0.00%
Return on assets (112.30%) (377.98%) 0.00%
Return on invested capital (278.56%) 0.00% 0.00%

Growth

Metric AMST ILLR Software Application median
Revenue growth (TTM) 313.44% 145.23% 12.40%
EPS growth (last fiscal year) 40.46% 94.63% —
Revenue growth, 5-year CAGR 13.10% 34.95% 13.72%
Net income growth, 5-year CAGR 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Health

Metric AMST ILLR Software Application median
Debt to equity 0.00 0.00 0.02
Current ratio 4.33 0.03 1.55
Net debt to EBITDA 0.74 0.00 0.06

Dividend

Metric AMST ILLR Software Application median
Dividend yield — — 1.25%
Payout ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00

Size

Metric AMST ILLR Software Application median
Market cap 6.62m 7.07m 396.11m

Compare with another peer

Any metric, up to five companies and an Excel export Powerpack