EPAM Systems, Inc.
EPAM Technology Information Technology Services
EPAM Systems, Inc.’s revenue for fiscal 2025 (year ended December 2025) was $5.5 billion, up 15.4% from fiscal 2024. In the quarter to June 2026, revenue grew 4.53%, EPS grew 26.3%, free cash flow fell 140.7% and total debt was flat, each against the same quarter a year earlier. Insiders bought in the last twelve months.
Follow EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) Beneish M-score
EPAM Systems, Inc.'s Beneish M-score for fiscal 2025 is −2.69; values above −1.78 are the model's flag for possible earnings manipulation — a statistical screen, not a finding.
Beneish M-score, annual
Embed this chart
Annual newest first
| Period | Beneish M-score | Change (points) |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −2.69 | (0.51) |
| FY2024 | −2.18 | 0.42 |
| FY2023 | −2.60 | (0.28) |
| FY2022 | −2.32 | (0.20) |
| FY2021 | −2.11 | 0.77 |
| FY2020 | −2.88 | (0.75) |
| FY2019 | −2.13 | 0.28 |
| FY2018 | −2.41 | 0.36 |
| FY2017 | −2.78 | (0.06) |
| FY2016 | −2.72 | (0.75) |
How fiscal 2025’s score is made up
| Component | This year | Year before | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days’ sales in receivables index | 0.96 | — | 0.88 | |
| Gross margin index | 1.06 | — | 0.56 | |
| Asset quality index | 0.99 | — | 0.40 | |
| Sales growth index | 1.15 | — | 1.03 | |
| Depreciation index | 0.79 | — | 0.09 | |
| SG&A index | 0.99 | — | −0.17 | |
| Total accruals to total assets | (0.06) | — | −0.26 | |
| Leverage index | 1.15 | — | −0.38 | |
| Beneish M-score | Low — no pattern the model associates with manipulation | −2.69 | ||
How the Beneish M-score works
M = −4.84 + 0.920 × DSRI + 0.528 × GMI + 0.404 × AQI + 0.892 × SGI + 0.115 × DEPI − 0.172 × SGAI + 4.679 × TATA − 0.327 × LVGI (Beneish, 1999): eight changes in the accounts from one fiscal year to the next, which the model weighs for the pattern seen in companies that later restated their earnings. Higher is worse.
| below −2.22 | Low — no pattern the model associates with manipulation |
|---|---|
| −2.22 to −1.78 | Elevated |
| above −1.78 | Flagged by the model |
−1.78 is the cut-off usually quoted from the paper, −2.22 a common conservative one. A statistical screen, not a finding of wrongdoing.
When asset quality, depreciation or SG&A cannot be worked out, that index is set to 1, as Beneish did, and the breakdown says so; with all three missing there is no score. Depreciation includes amortisation, and asset quality leaves out securities. Not worked out for banks, insurers and REITs.
Beneish M-score against peers
| Company | Beneish M-score |
|---|---|
| CIFR Cipher Digital Inc. compare | −5.0× |
| SAIC Science Applications International Corporation compare | −2.9× |
| G Genpact Limited compare | −2.7× |
| GDS GDS Holdings compare | −2.7× |
| EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc. | −2.7× |
| EXLS ExlService Holdings, Inc. compare | −2.7× |
| PSN Parsons Corporation compare | −2.7× |
| INGM Ingram Micro Holding Corporation compare | −2.5× |
| APLD Applied Digital Corporation compare | 0.5× |
What Beneish M-score is
The Beneish M-Score combines eight year-on-year changes in the accounts into a statistical screen for patterns seen in companies that overstated earnings.
−4.84 + 0.920 × DSRI + 0.528 × GMI + 0.404 × AQI + 0.892 × SGI + 0.115 × DEPI − 0.172 × SGAI + 4.679 × TATA − 0.327 × LVGI